Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Compare BRC standard version 5 with Dutch HACCP (A)

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

PAL

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 21 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Netherlands
    Netherlands

Posted 26 November 2008 - 07:08 PM

Hi,

I just saw this web forum today after searching for some information. I didn´t know that this forum exists.
A nice one I think ! :rolleyes:

I´m searching for a comparison between the BRC standard version 5 and the Dutch HACCP (version A) standard.

I know that this kind of cross link tables exists.

It would be grate if someone can upload it or send me the link where I can found it.

Many thanks in advance


PAL



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,831 posts
  • 1363 thanks
881
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 26 November 2008 - 09:38 PM

Hi PAL welcome to the forums. Hopefully someone will be able to help you with your quest.

:welcome:

Regards,
Simon


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


PAL

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 21 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Netherlands
    Netherlands

Posted 29 November 2008 - 08:48 AM

Any change that someone can put me in the right direction?

I think that this kind of reference matrix table must exists while I found many others on the internet but none compare between BRC and HACCP.

All help is more than :welcome:

Thanks in advance.
PAL



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5664 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 29 November 2008 - 02:30 PM

Dear PAL,

I understand that BRC is based on Codex HACCP so as far as HACCP is concerned, I guess yr query is essentially Dutch HACCP vs Codex HACCP. I cannot find anything as recent as BRCv.5 but if validity to 2006 is any use, there is some detailed x-comparisons in the link below (particularly main text and annex4)

Attached File  Comparison_various_food_safety_standards_.pdf   799.72KB   294 downloads

(If you are also interested in other related cross-comparisons, I extracted this from my post in the thread http://www.ifsqn.com...showtopic=10031 )

Hopefully of some help

Rgds / Charles.C

PS - I noticed a comment elsewhere that it is Dutch HACCP (B) which recognised by GFSI but hv no idea the difference between A and B (I'm sure you do though :smile: )

PPS - I also later noticed that the freely downloadable Dutch HACCP (A),(B) (2006) documents contain a detailed x- comparison to Codex HACCP (annex2) ??


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


PAL

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 21 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Netherlands
    Netherlands

Posted 29 November 2008 - 04:17 PM


Many thanks for repling on my message. This is a good start to work with it further. I think that I have to work it out by myself :unsure:


In the link below you can download (pdf format) the cross reference between option A and B. Sadly this is only in Dutch.
http://www.foodsafet...ce_volledig.pdf
(from the website www. foodsafetymanagement).

The reason for the 2 options is due to the GFSI demands. The combination of A (management system) and B (proces, productcertification) will be a good alternative for IFS / BRC / SQF2000. The report is also strong altered.
This "new" Dutch HACCP aims a better possition than ISO 22000 at the moment. It's a good solution for organisations who wants to meet the GFSI standards with one assessment.
It's free to choice for one or both options. Mosly this depent on the customers aims.

PAL




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users