Food Safety Network: Help Choosing A Standard - Food Safety Network

Jump to content


IFSQN News & Offers:
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Help Choosing A Standard Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Anjru 

  • Active User
  • Group: Active User
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 08-November 10
  • Thanked: 0 times

Posted 18 March 2011 - 09:04 PM

Our facility has been working on the BRC Standard, which is required by one of our customers for their product. Since our current 3rd party standard (AIB) is expiring in 2 months, we were trying to certify our whole facility through the BRC. Long story short, I don't think we are quite ready to pass, we are probably another 4-6 months out.

I need help deciding on another Standard that is well respected, but maybe isn't quite as comprehensive as the BRC. We manufacture granola based products, bars and clusters.
0

#2 User is offline   Charles.C 

  • Fellow - FIFSQN
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 4,286
  • Joined: 13-April 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Thanked: 447 times

Posted 18 March 2011 - 10:15 PM

Dear Anjru,

Welcome to the forum ! :welcome:

It may depend on why you are not ready to pass ??

Rgds / Charles.C
0

#3 User is offline   GMO 

  • Fellow - FIFSQN
  • Group: Fellow (FIFSQN)
  • Posts: 1,550
  • Joined: 20-March 08

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Thanked: 212 times

Posted 19 March 2011 - 08:21 AM

Hmmm. Personally I wouldn't think that BRC is that onerous in an established factory. I think as well it would look strange to go for another standard, let AIB lapse then BRC a few months later. Why not extend AIB (which you know and are presumably compliant to)?

Also are you really not ready for BRC or are you just doing yourself down? Might be worth getting a pre-audit done to see how close you are from an objective standpoint.
0

#4 User is offline   Foodworker 

  • Member - MIFSQN
  • Group: Member (MIFSQN)
  • Posts: 178
  • Joined: 30-August 10

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Thanked: 93 times

Posted 19 March 2011 - 10:14 AM

Ultimately your choice of Standard will depend upon your customers' requirements.

Some will say you need the BRC and if you don't you can't supply. If they are not specific, then you have more options. As said previously if you are currently AIB compliant and your customer accepts AIB, why change?

Where are you based and who is your customer?
0

#5 User is offline   Tony-C 

  • Fellow - FIFSQN
  • Group: Fellow (FIFSQN)
  • Posts: 1,076
  • Joined: 04-June 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Koh Samui
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, scuba diving and skiing

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Thanked: 120 times

Posted 20 March 2011 - 12:26 PM

View PostAnjru, on 18 March 2011 - 09:04 PM, said:

Our facility has been working on the BRC Standard, which is required by one of our customers for their product. Since our current 3rd party standard (AIB) is expiring in 2 months, we were trying to certify our whole facility through the BRC. Long story short, I don't think we are quite ready to pass, we are probably another 4-6 months out.

I need help deciding on another Standard that is well respected, but maybe isn't quite as comprehensive as the BRC. We manufacture granola based products, bars and clusters.


Hi Anjru,

I don't see AIB as being any less demanding than BRC so can't see what the problem is?

Regards,

Tony
0

#6 User is offline   Simon 

  • Fellow - FIFSQN
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 8,072
  • Joined: 06-December 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Life, Family, Work, Sport, The Internet, Food, Sleeping and lot's of other things...

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Thanked: 166 times

Posted 20 March 2011 - 09:58 PM

Maybe SQF 2000 at the easier level (2 I think?)
Signature Seperator image

Posted Image
Need food safety advice?
Relax, you’ve come to the right place…

IFSQN is a helpful network of volunteers providing answers and support. Check out the forums and get free advice form the experts on food safety management systems and a wide range of food safety topics.

Join IFSQN today, You'll be glad that you did. Posted Image

Helpful Information >>>

Register Here >>>
0

#7 User is offline   Dr Ajay Shah 

  • Senior – SIFSQN
  • Group: Senior (SIFSQN)
  • Posts: 308
  • Joined: 15-February 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne

  • Australia
    Australia
  • Thanked: 92 times

Posted 21 March 2011 - 09:41 AM

BRC, SQF or ISO 22000 are all very well respected standards globally. One should not look for an easier option as you will only dilute your food quality and safety by compromising it.

Regards

Ajay
Signature Seperator image

Dr Ajay Shah.,
BSc (Hons), MSc, PhD, PGCE(FE)
Managing Director & Principal Consultant
AAS Food Technology Pty Ltd
www.aasfood.com

0

#8 User is offline   GMO 

  • Fellow - FIFSQN
  • Group: Fellow (FIFSQN)
  • Posts: 1,550
  • Joined: 20-March 08

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Thanked: 212 times

Posted 21 March 2011 - 01:08 PM

View PostAnjru, on 18 March 2011 - 09:04 PM, said:

Our facility has been working on the BRC Standard, which is required by one of our customers for their product. Since our current 3rd party standard (AIB) is expiring in 2 months, we were trying to certify our whole facility through the BRC. Long story short, I don't think we are quite ready to pass, we are probably another 4-6 months out.

I need help deciding on another Standard that is well respected, but maybe isn't quite as comprehensive as the BRC. We manufacture granola based products, bars and clusters.


Have you had any thoughts now you've heard ours?
0



Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Similar Topics Collapse

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users