Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Microbiological testing of packaging - is it required, if so what?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Charles Chew

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,178 posts
  • 54 thanks
15
Good

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Food, food and food!

Posted 15 April 2013 - 12:23 PM

Hi All,

Personally I think it risk assessment plays a key role here.

If you can risk assess you packaging - including supplier, number of supplier non-conformances, packaging storage location, risk rating of food produced etc... then this should be able to determine whether your should micro test your packaging, and the frequency to which it should be done.

I have seen packaging stored out in the rain before as the supplier can only sends full container loads and the storage area wasn't large enough to house them all. I know, not ideal however this is something that should be considered.

We used to micro test packaging when producing RTE chilled dips and sandwich fillings on a monthly basis. Never had any problems however when a certain 5 letter retailer asked they were very impressed that we took this in to consideration. For the amount it cost us (10 x packs per month for TVC & Ents = £15/month) it was worth it.

Regards

Simon

I fully support your view and believe potential microbiological contamination concerns WILL ALWAYS BE LIKELY TO OCCUR as a result of post-production residual risk (which requires risk assessment). I also believe it is more important to know WHEN to test a packaging material rather than WHAT to test. IMO, heavy metal and migration concerns are more relevant than microbial. This is a good thread.

Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 16 April 2013 - 01:28 AM

I fully support your view and believe potential microbiological contamination concerns WILL ALWAYS BE LIKELY TO OCCUR as a result of post-production residual risk (which requires risk assessment). I also believe it is more important to know WHEN to test a packaging material rather than WHAT to test. IMO, heavy metal and migration concerns are more relevant than microbial. This is a good thread.

Dear Charles Chew,

Receiver's viewpoint. (No labels in direct food contact. Frozen raw / cooked foods.)

IMHO, the aspect under discussion is totally a supplier's responsibility.

Food Grade = Food Grade.

My only (safety) risk assessment is a (mainly) GMP audit + typical supplier documentation (eg BCPA product specifications, raw material / converter documentation, etc).

Plus "appearance" control at reception.

Never had a (safety) problem. Too trusting ?

Rgds / Charles.C

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,826 posts
  • 1363 thanks
880
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 19 April 2013 - 07:59 PM

IMO, heavy metal and migration concerns are more relevant than microbial.

If the packaging supplier has good GMP and Hygiene controls I agree with the above statement. That said microbial monitoring/results is great evidence to have in place to give customers confidence. Customers can relate to it as they have to do it themselves and for the relative low cost of maintaining such a programme IMO it's well worth the investment. Sometimes (just sometimes) our FSMS can be shaped by feeling and not only data.

Cheers,
Simon




Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


flyingdutchman

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 10 May 2013 - 05:10 PM

How much initial testing should you do and what should you test in order to give you a good indication on frequency of testing needed?



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 10 May 2013 - 05:18 PM

How much initial testing should you do and what should you test in order to give you a good indication on frequency of testing needed?

Type of packaging / process ??

 

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users