Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

ISO/TR 10013: Guidelines for quality management system documentation

ISO 10013 quality documentation system management guidelines standards

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

Poll: ISO/TR 10013: Guidelines for quality management system documentation (34 member(s) have cast votes)

What do you think about using of ISO/TR 10013: Guidelines for quality management system documentation?

  1. Voted I heard about ISO/TR 10013 but I am not familiar with it. (9 votes [26.47%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 26.47%

  2. I think ISO/TR 10013 is very useful but I never tried to implement it. (4 votes [11.76%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.76%

  3. I tried to implement it but without success. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. I am using these guidelines (ISO/TR 10013) very successfully in the practice. (1 votes [2.94%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.94%

  5. I never heard about this guidelines (ISO/TR 10013). (20 votes [58.82%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 58.82%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Jelena C

Jelena C

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Serbia
    Serbia
  • Gender:Female

Posted 06 September 2013 - 09:21 AM

I am wondering if anyone is familiar with practical side of suggested guidelines in standard ISO/TR 10013. Please, fill free to answer to my poll as I want to use result for my research of this kind of standards with guidelines.

 

Thank you  :mwah:

 

   :thumbup:


Edited by Jelena C, 25 September 2013 - 02:23 PM.


#2 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 13,589 posts
  • 3730 thanks
407
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 06 September 2013 - 01:12 PM

 

I am wondering if anyone is familiar with practical side of suggested guidelines in standard ISO/TR 10013. Please, fill free to answer to my poll as I want to use result for my research of this kind of standards with guidelines.

 

Thank you  :mwah:

 

   :thumbup:

 

 

Dear Jelena,

 

Does this poll replace yr first one ??

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ing/#entry64168

 

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


#3 Jelena C

Jelena C

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Serbia
    Serbia
  • Gender:Female

Posted 06 September 2013 - 01:20 PM

Dear Jelena,

 

Does this poll replace yr first one ??

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ing/#entry64168

 

Rgds / Charles.C

 

Dear Simone,

 

No, this is new one for the ISO/TR 10013 and the previous one is for the ISO 10015 ;) Two different things :D



#4 Jelena C

Jelena C

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Serbia
    Serbia
  • Gender:Female

Posted 25 September 2013 - 02:19 PM

683 views and only 27 votes, interesting...I expected more :(



#5 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 13,589 posts
  • 3730 thanks
407
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 26 September 2013 - 04:36 PM

 

683 views and only 27 votes, interesting...I expected more :(

 

 

My guess is that it means a large number of views are either from non-members, people who dislike polls in general, or  people who are unwilling to admit that they've never heard of anything (a tempting line of thought). Or permutations of. :smile:

 

At least you have surely, statistically, demonstrated that direct usage is  "low"  (ca 3%) and any knowledge of the standard is "lowish" (ca 13%). Presumably not entirely uncorrelated.

 

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

#6 Jelena C

Jelena C

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 27 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Serbia
    Serbia
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 September 2013 - 08:07 AM

My guess is that it means a large number of views are either from non-members, people who dislike polls in general, or  people who are unwilling to admit that they've never heard of anything (a tempting line of thought). Or permutations of. :smile:

 

At least you have surely, statistically, demonstrated that direct usage is  "low"  (ca 3%) and any knowledge of the standard is "lowish" (ca 13%). Presumably not entirely uncorrelated.

 

Rgds / Charles.C

Thank you, Charles...funny and clever as always  :happydance:







0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users