Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Use of white out in office and plant?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 smyers

smyers

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 18 August 2014 - 02:28 PM

What is the official stance of using white out (office/plant)? Is just the liquid verision prohibited? what about the tape dispensing version? We are a packaging manufacturer.


  • 0

#2 SpursGirl

SpursGirl

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 114 posts
  • 71 thanks
26
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:PA

Posted 18 August 2014 - 02:36 PM

I ban the use of any correction method (icluding white out tape) in all locations office and plant. I have also seen the use of small pieces of blank white labels stuck over mistakes - also banned.

 

Any mistake is to be crossed through with one line and initialled by the person making the correction - this is stated in my records and documents policy.

 

In my experience if you have correction fluid/tape in the offices it inevitably ends up on the factory floor. Better to have a total ban than to try and manage use in some areas.

 

S


  • 1

Thanked by 1 Member:

#3 Setanta

Setanta

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 959 posts
  • 220 thanks
115
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Reading: historical fiction, fantasy, Sci-Fi
    Movies
    Gardening
    Birding

Posted 18 August 2014 - 02:40 PM

Totally in agreement with SpursGirl.  If you work with governmental organizations, USDA, FDA, etc, they will advise you against it.  They must be able to read the error.


  • 1

-Setanta                 WeepingAngela.gif

 


Thanked by 1 Member:

#4 Snookie

Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,619 posts
  • 255 thanks
162
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 18 August 2014 - 03:40 PM

White out is an absolute no-no. Very often regulators consider your trying to hide something and the penalty can be worse than the mistake.   


  • 0
Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

Thanked by 1 Member:

#5 ShannonH

ShannonH

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 17 posts
  • 2 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 18 August 2014 - 04:46 PM

The guidelines for Module 2 of the SQF code state 2.2.2 Records- "On paper-based records, the use of correction fluid to address corrections is not recommended.  A line through the inaccurate recording, with accurate recording and initials of the monitor is recommended."

 

Not prohibited, but certainly not liked!


  • 0

#6 Slab

Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 284 posts
  • 123 thanks
47
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heel of the Boot
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted 18 August 2014 - 06:52 PM

Do they still make correction fluid? I know that when I first started at my current job it was a common practice to keep correction tape in receiving and the packaging area for tally sheets (along with paperclips and staplers :angry2: ), but I quickly did away with that with my jack-booted-correction-tape-dispenser-crushing-gestapo like tactics (yes, I am that QA Manager). I even had to ban the use of pencils and ink of any other color than blue and black for controlled documents.

 

Our policy for corrections is strictly a single strike-through and initials.  


Edited by Slab, 18 August 2014 - 06:53 PM.

  • 1

Food Safety News  Marine Stewardship Council  Blue Ocean Institute  

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


Thanked by 1 Member:

#7 fgjuadi

fgjuadi

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • Banned
  • 898 posts
  • 193 thanks
9
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 18 August 2014 - 09:50 PM

No white out!  I've allowed it in office areas if the office area is locked & physically separated from production - my poor accountants !  But if they can get to the office, they can get to white out. 

 

 

 I even had to ban the use of pencils and ink of any other color than blue and black for controlled documents.

 

Our policy for corrections is strictly a single strike-through and initials.  

 

We only allow  glitter pens and black paper  here, because we're all about high contrast & Lisa Frank. 


  • 1
.--. .- -. - ... / --- .--. - .. --- -. .- .-..

Thanked by 1 Member:

#8 Ragga

Ragga

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 4 thanks
2
Neutral

  • New Zealand
    New Zealand

Posted 18 August 2014 - 11:03 PM

The thing with white out is that, people don't like it on official documents as it appears to hide things. Scribbling and "overwriting" is also frowned upon.

 

All records in a FSMS should be considered as official and proper error correction rules should apply. In the case a problem happens it is beneficial for the companies records to appear totally transparent so the evidence provided for a complaint investigation or insurance claim etc.is not doubted by other parties.

 

The number of refresher training documents i've conducted on production and management staff on proper error correction you would not believe and it is still not resolvable, though it has improved somewhat.


  • 0

#9 MCIAN

MCIAN

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 100 posts
  • 36 thanks
9
Neutral

  • Philippines
    Philippines
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Law of attraction & Meditation

Posted 19 August 2014 - 05:03 AM

White outs, pencils and other colored pens (non-black and blue) are not allowed in our entire plant including offices. 

We have guidelines on how to do proper error correction.

 

Regards.

 

:shades:


  • 0

#10 GMO

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,216 posts
  • 468 thanks
55
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 19 August 2014 - 05:58 AM

Absolutely not. Think about it, if you use white out / tippex etc, you can't necessarily see what was changed. Just a single line through a mistake and an initial to authorise it. Think of your paperwork as legal documents (which they are). White out looks like you're making stuff up.


  • 0

#11 Snookie

Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,619 posts
  • 255 thanks
162
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 19 August 2014 - 04:52 PM

The guidelines for Module 2 of the SQF code state 2.2.2 Records- "On paper-based records, the use of correction fluid to address corrections is not recommended.  A line through the inaccurate recording, with accurate recording and initials of the monitor is recommended."

 

Not prohibited, but certainly not liked!

 

You try telling that to the USDA or the FDA......

 

Many years ago....well before my time as I am certainly not old enough to have personally seen this (that's my story and I am sticking to it) it was clearly spelled out in the CFR, (Code of Federal Regulations), it has since been changed and is more inferred, but is no less considered to be required.  They most likely won't shut you down, but they will definitely admonish you for it. 


  • 0
Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

#12 Slab

Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 284 posts
  • 123 thanks
47
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heel of the Boot
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted 19 August 2014 - 06:07 PM

 

We only allow  glitter pens and black paper  here, because we're all about high contrast & Lisa Frank. 

 

I would seriously have a death-dealing stroke, then haunt the Lisa Frank perp from beyond the grave like that cat-boy in The Grudge  :death:

 

You try telling that to the USDA or the FDA......

 

 

 

Exactly.  Just don't do it boys and girls. I would just as soon put an employee in the soup line at the local shelter than take a non-conformance for record keeping.


  • 0

Food Safety News  Marine Stewardship Council  Blue Ocean Institute  

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


#13 weloveplastic

weloveplastic

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 17 posts
  • 2 thanks
2
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa

Posted 21 August 2014 - 02:17 PM

No white out!  I've allowed it in office areas if the office area is locked & physically separated from production - my poor accountants !  But if they can get to the office, they can get to white out. 

 

 

 

We only allow  glitter pens and black paper  here, because we're all about high contrast & Lisa Frank. 

Thank you for this fabulous response :biggrin: regarding black paper and glitter pens, it made me laugh, and we all need to laugh at the end of the day.


  • 0

#14 Snookie

Snookie

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,619 posts
  • 255 thanks
162
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 21 August 2014 - 04:23 PM

Thank you for this fabulous response :biggrin: regarding black paper and glitter pens, it made me laugh, and we all need to laugh at the end of the day.

 

Its also a great way to start the day.....to go through the day...... :roflmao:


  • 0
Posted Image
Live Long & Prosper

#15 Mr. Incognito

Mr. Incognito

    "Mostly Harmless"

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,552 posts
  • 258 thanks
121
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 August 2014 - 04:26 PM

What is the official stance of using white out (office/plant)? Is just the liquid verision prohibited? what about the tape dispensing version? We are a packaging manufacturer.

 

Your policy for white out of any type should be this:

 

Pick up white out,

Walk outside of plant,

Throw in dumpster.


  • 1
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mr. Incognito


:tardis:

Mr. Incognito is a cool frood who can travel the width and breadth of the galaxy and still know where his towel is.

#16 Jus'me

Jus'me

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 53 posts
  • 20 thanks
6
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Missouri

Posted 22 August 2014 - 08:41 PM

It is one of the basics of GMP's for correction of documents, a single line through it with initials, (I usually add the date of the correction for good measure :biggrin: ), no white out/ no total obliteration, must be able to see what was corrected.  It's a struggle to get people to conform,, I'm always noting "not following proper GMP" on my document audits, we've trained, we've given tests, but people still revert back, but you have to stick to it and be vigilant.  but definitely a "no-no" to use any type of white out or correction tape. Be ready for a fight though, people LOVE their white out!


  • 1

#17 Sean Mitchell

Sean Mitchell

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 16 September 2014 - 06:08 PM

White out (like variation) is evil!

 

We too have official documentation policies that prohibit the use of liquid or tape correction. Simple cross through correction, with initial and date (if room). It is a struggle to get conformance, but we have tried to have some fun with it in our training (I bet there's two words never uttered before in the same sentence...). We have used pop quizzes with funny/obviously ridiculous answer options to get i) folks to laugh and ii) point out how basic and easy it is.  

 

As with everything else, it requires some repetition to get it to stick, but we've seen a significant improvement in our documentation practices.


  • 0

#18 RG3

RG3

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 501 posts
  • 152 thanks
70
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them" Albert Einstein

Posted 16 September 2014 - 07:48 PM

I think SpursGirl hit it on the dot and SQF does spell it out word for word as mentioned by Shannon.


  • 0

#19 fcchoi

fcchoi

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 53 posts
  • 7 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kuala Lumpur

Posted 17 September 2014 - 07:39 AM

strictly prohibited, mark it out and rewrite with initials, tq.


  • 0

#20 PetBone

PetBone

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 49 posts
  • 2 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 23 September 2014 - 01:32 PM

I have always been under the impression that both white out (of any kind) and scribbled out responses on paperwork are not acceptable practices. Rather they should be treated similar to how you would correct a mistake on a check, 1 single cross out line with initials and then the correct response written next to the mistake.


  • 0

#21 Chris Domenico

Chris Domenico

    Associate - AIFSQN

  • Corporate Sponsor
  • 101 posts
  • 49 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York, NY

Posted 23 September 2014 - 03:58 PM

I think it has been well established by the vast majority of responses you received that aside from being a legal no-no, the use of white out will give your auditors a poor impression of your overall record/documentation system. 

 

The people that are filling out these records are human and they are bound to make a mistake. Any corrections made must always be done in an authorized and controlled manner (one line/initial). 

 

If a BRC or SQF auditor see records with white out them, you can pretty much bank on getting what could have been a very avoidable non-conformance. 

 

By the way, if you make it a rule that "the use of white out is strictly prohibited" you can pretty much bank on the fact that people are going to want to break that rule for a good while. Once again, they are human after all..... :wacko:

 

-Chris 


Edited by Chris Domenico, 23 September 2014 - 03:58 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users