Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Control Points (CP's) in a BRC v6

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic
- - - - -

FerranFlo

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 19 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 19 March 2015 - 02:48 PM

Hi Guys

I have a question about BRC and IFS decision trees

Our company is already certified by IFS v6 and we want a combined BRC v6 and IFS system.

¿Is it possible to have control points in a BRC v6 or I have to manage all my control measures as CCP?

Are there many many differences between both systems?

regards



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 19 March 2015 - 03:59 PM

BRC is quite closely based on Codex-HACCP. The list of terminologies used by Codex does not include “control point”(CP). And afaik, BRC do not use CP either.

 

I have little knowledge of IFS but a quick look at ifs6 mentions Codex. Perhaps ifs have modified Codex with CP in it. :dunno:

(I have seen CP in IFS occasionally equated to (iso)OPRP (ie not Codex-CCP)).

 

The US approach as pioneered by  NACMCF does include “control point” (CP)  but with a different meaning to their own CCP (which is very similar to Codex).

 

So I guess my answer to yr queries is (a) No and (b) No usage of IFS

 

 FWIW I have enclosed a clause comparison (2005) between brc4 and ifs4 from my archive. At that time the differences were substantial. There is probably a more current comparison on this forum somewhere.

 

Attached File  brc4 compared to ifs4 - 2005_Jan_GFSIComparisonDocument BRC4IFS4.pdf   300.29KB   49 downloads

 

Thanks / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 19 March 2015 - 05:23 PM

Here's one for BRC V6 and IFS V6 if that's any help

 

 

Attached Files


I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

Thanked by 3 Members:

FerranFlo

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 19 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 20 March 2015 - 07:45 AM

Then, I should change all CP's to CCP's in the analysis risk if I want to combinate IFS and BRC

Thank for all yours comments and the linked information



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 20 March 2015 - 08:21 AM

Here's one for BRC V6 and IFS V6 if that's any help

 

My excel dwl is in Italian/Spanish/?

 

Probably fine for the OP but .....? :smile:

 

I suppose English was not an option ? (Other than by a probably futile, self-slog/Google of course).

 

Plaudits to yr linguistic ability. :thumbup:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


FerranFlo

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 19 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 20 March 2015 - 08:31 AM

In BRC I found the following:

Clause 2.7.3 requires that when control is achieved through prerequisite programmes the adequacy of the programmes in controlling the hazard this should be stated (documented) and validated. Combinations of control measures should be taken into consideration in this process.

¿Could be CP's inlcuded in this clause? we use a modified decision tree to consider CP's and CCP's.

Charles, I found a useful tool to translate the file. Very interesting the cross references  :spoton:



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,835 posts
  • 1363 thanks
884
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 20 March 2015 - 08:36 AM

Charles, I found a useful tool to translate the file. Very interesting the cross references  :spoton:

 

Is it worth reposting the translated document, or is it too much gobbledygook?


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 20 March 2015 - 08:40 AM

Is it worth reposting the translated document, or is it too much gobbledygook?

 

I had a go at a recent slavonic one in another thread also in excel.

 

A labour of Pain.

 

I also played with various (all-in-one-go) apps offered on a few other geek forums. More Pain, no Gain. Maybe not geek-enough

 

But maybe this language has a dedicated app. which works better. FerranFlo ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


FerranFlo

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 19 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 20 March 2015 - 11:30 AM

Mainly I'm interested in the cross references between IFS and BRC, I tried to translate the excel from  italian to spanish using the auto-translating, as Charles proposed in a previous comments, and it worked quite well excepting some clauses.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 20 March 2015 - 06:17 PM

Here is a translation from Italian to English of the sheet (IFS ver.6 vs BRC Food6) extracted from  trubertq’s previous attachment.

Overall intelligibility looks not too bad IMO. A few words were clearly too tough for the dictionary.

The original aligning of these two standards against each other must have been a challenge. To my eyes, the differences in the details are substantial.

I haven’t checked all the resulting format alignments so if anyone comes across any major errors, pls inform.

 

Attached File  IFSver.6 vs BRC Food ver.6(ENG).xls   182.5KB   60 downloads


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,835 posts
  • 1363 thanks
884
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 20 March 2015 - 06:19 PM

Can you do it against BRC version 7 now. :lol:

 

Seriously that's great work Charles, thanks and well done.


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 21 March 2015 - 05:12 PM

Here is the correct document in English , eventually

 

Attached File  BRC IFS Comparison.docx   220.03KB   120 downloads

 

Attached File  BRC IFS Comparison 972003.doc   826KB   116 downloads

 


I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 21 March 2015 - 07:58 PM

Well done. Thks. i daresay some other users of vintage equipment will thank you also. :smile:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users