Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Hazard Significance Risk Matrix

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic
- - - - -

calaggal

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 33 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 April 2015 - 03:36 PM

Good morning,

 

Happy Monday everyone!!! While conducting my hazard analysis, do I need to use a significance risk matrix or is a CCP tree good enough? If I do need a matrix, does anyone have sample one I can use?

 

Thanks!



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 April 2015 - 03:47 PM

Hi calaggal,

 

Can you clarify one thing - any particular standard involved.?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


calaggal

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 33 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 April 2015 - 04:10 PM

No specific standard is involved it is for a dry bean packing facility, really no hazards but physical, because of a kill step in the cooking process. It is a real basic plan. My customer needs the plan, because a customer of theirs asked if they had a HACCP.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 April 2015 - 04:44 PM

No specific standard is involved it is for a dry bean packing facility, really no hazards but physical, because of a kill step in the cooking process. It is a real basic plan. My customer needs the plan, because a customer of theirs asked if they had a HACCP.

 

Thks for response.

 

As per above, I guess the choice is yours to use or not use a matrix. There are several styles without on offer. :smile: (I use a matrix myself but just my choice).

 

For example one popular style in USA/Canada seems to be via a Table of Codex tree based questions. No matrix required afai can see. I guess you are familiar with this already.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


calaggal

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 33 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 April 2015 - 05:13 PM

What matrix do you use/prefer?



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 April 2015 - 05:43 PM

What matrix do you use/prefer?

 

I use the one shown on sheet3 of the model excel file attached to this post -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ge-4#entry50651

 

But a lot of people like simpler formats like 3 x 3, 4 x 4, whatever. It depends somewhat on personal choice, the product/process and one's particular procedure for developing the haccp plan.

 

The link above is oriented to iso22000 but the methodology in excel file-hazard analysis is equally applicable to traditional haccp except need to delete 1-2 redundant  columns .in left hand section + the iso oprp/ccp part on right hand side.

 

The use of a 3x3 one is demonstrated in the model haccp plan inside the zip file in this post -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...indpost&p=84876


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users