Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Terms and Definitions of Food Safety Standards

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Lelouch_rayne

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 160 posts
  • 26 thanks
6
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 09 June 2016 - 04:07 AM

Hi all,

 

 

Do you know any manual or references where I could see the official definition of terms mentioned in any Food safety Standards?

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Joan

 



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 09 June 2016 - 05:05 AM

Hi all,

 

 

Do you know any manual or references where I could see the official definition of terms mentioned in any Food safety Standards?

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Joan

 

Hi Joan,

 

I think the problem is that there are often many different "Official" definitions.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Lelouch_rayne

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 160 posts
  • 26 thanks
6
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 09 June 2016 - 05:19 AM

Do you know any reference of those official definitions? Anything will do.

 

 

Thanks.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 09 June 2016 - 05:32 AM

Hi Joan,

 

Just as an example, BRC for their HACCP definitions cite Codex.

 

The "official" reference is logically to the most recent version of the Codex Hygiene publication which afaik is 2009. I expect you are familiar with that already.

 

SQF similarly cite Codex (and NACMCF) but from memory still reference the 2003 Codex version ('or latest version" perhaps). Their updating system is slow.

NACMCF afaik only has one (final) published version, ca 1997.

 

However the haccp definitions in "Codex Hygiene" 2009, 2003, 1997 are from memory near identical. Possibly even 100% identical.

 

Is that what you wanted ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users