Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Why doesn't ISO implement the FSSC22000 scheme?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 melle

melle

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Netherlands
    Netherlands

Posted 01 April 2017 - 12:04 AM

Hi dear colleagues

 

I'm implementing FSSC22000 in small cheese processing plant/distribution centre. I was just wondering why ISO doesn't implement the FSSC22000 scheme and make it an GFSI certified scheme. Isn't it just much easier to make ISO22000 + 220002-x + the FSSC rules in one big new ISO 22000 wich is GFSI certified? 


  • 0

#2 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 12,575 posts
  • 3275 thanks
350
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 03 April 2017 - 09:58 AM

(>=) Two standards = More profit than one.


  • 0

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 2 Members:

#3 swanny297

swanny297

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 3 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 05 April 2017 - 12:34 PM

Hi dear colleagues

 

I'm implementing FSSC22000 in small cheese processing plant/distribution centre. I was just wondering why ISO doesn't implement the FSSC22000 scheme and make it an GFSI certified scheme. Isn't it just much easier to make ISO22000 + 220002-x + the FSSC rules in one big new ISO 22000 wich is GFSI certified? 

 

FSSC22000 is already a recognized GFSI scheme


  • 0

#4 melle

melle

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Netherlands
    Netherlands

Posted 05 April 2017 - 12:36 PM

FSSC22000 is indeed. ISO 22000 isn't. Was just wondering why ISO didn't make a GFSI recognised scheme.


  • 0

#5 Caglar

Caglar

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 29 posts
  • 8 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Iceland
    Iceland

Posted 30 June 2017 - 05:28 PM

I always wondered that myself. My guess is ISO intends to be as generic as possible in order to be applicable to all plants regardless of its capacity. In that sense more requirements will make it more specific so less companies will join the ISO program (meaning less income). 


  • 0

#6 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 12,575 posts
  • 3275 thanks
350
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 01 July 2017 - 03:44 AM

I always wondered that myself. My guess is ISO intends to be as generic as possible in order to be applicable to all plants regardless of its capacity. In that sense more requirements will make it more specific so less companies will join the ISO program (meaning less income). 

 

Hi Caglar,

 

Yes, and expanding slightly -

 

But ISO 22000 alone doesn’t meet the GFSI benchmarking requirements, for 2 major reasons:

  1. The choice of the applicable PRPs is open for the certified company,
  2. There is no scheme owner behind ISO 22000 certification, to control that certification bodies operate according to GFSI compliant procedure.

 

http://ask-bioexpert...e-supply-chain/


  • 0

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users