Hi All,
We are currently re-writing our HACCP plans and in doing so, have found that we need additional CPs and CCPs.
Now, I understand each product group and plan are specific, but I am confused on how I should be numbering my CPs and CCPs.
The HACCP plans that have been written previously had a standard numbering system across all plans and the processes were made to mirror the last. CCP1 has always been metal detection for all plans.
In the review we found a plan that needs different CPs and CCPs before metal detection. Rule of thumb should be to number the CPs and CCPs according to where it falls within the process, whether it is the first critical control in your process, second, and so on.
Unfortunately, knowing the rule of thumb is not helping me much. Metal detection is still a critical control for all of our HACCP plans and I feel that if we label it as CCP1 in 3 plans and in the forth plan it falls at CCP4 it will be confusing for all team members to grasp. I also feel that we will need to have specific documentation for the specified CCP which will result in us having more than one form for the same critical point.
I have thought a lot on how I can make this work to our advantage and have come up with a solution (I am not sure it is good or if it will work) and I am looking for advice, help, and suggestions.
I have broken down all processes throughout all plans (very similar processes but very different product groups) and have a list:
- Purchasing
- Receiving / Storage
- Scaling
- Mixing
- Depositing / Forming
- Baking
- Freezing
- Packing (IW)
- Metal Detection
- Case Packing
- Storage
- Shipping
With this process list I came up with a way to make each CP or CCP specific to each plan but have them named the same throughout all the plans. This involved not using numbers. Below is an example in the same flow as the above process steps:
- CP-P / CCP-P
- CP-R / CCP-R
- CP-S / CCP-S
- CP-M / CCP-M
- CP-DF / CCP-DF
- CP-B / CCP - B
- CP-FZ / CCP-FZ
- CP-PK / CCP-PK
- CP-MD / CCP-MD
- CP-CPK / CCP-CPK
- CP-ST / CCP-ST
- CP-SH / CCP-SH
My Plan is to document the reasoning for pre-determined process names at each step even though they currently may not be considered a CP or CCP.
Has anyone ever written a program like this, seen a program like this, or am I just 100% incorrect in my thinking?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Angela