Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Product rejected, how to handle the rework?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

jdominguez

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 03 May 2017 - 05:45 PM

hello all,

 

I recently joined this forum and are the process of implementing level two of sqf. Its still in the works so our prps are still being developed. Our facility recently sent out some material with canola oil on the cores, shortly after our customer rejected the load and now needs rework. I'm not familiar with FSSC 22000 as that's what they are certified for. we use canola oil as a processing aid, can anyone help with this issue?



FurFarmandFork

    Food Safety Consultant, Production Supervisor

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,264 posts
  • 590 thanks
206
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon, USA

Posted 04 May 2017 - 04:15 PM

Hi Jdominguez,

 

A clearer description of your product would be helpful, don't know what you mean by "cores", what impact Canola oil would have on quality, and what the expectations of the customer and yourself are. In addition, what would rework accomplish?


Austin Bouck
Owner/Consultant at Fur, Farm, and Fork.
Consulting for companies needing effective, lean food safety systems and solutions.

Subscribe to the blog at furfarmandfork.com for food safety research, insights, and analysis.

jdominguez

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 04 May 2017 - 09:21 PM

Hello furfarmandfork,

 

product is flexible packaging. we wind this material onto 3 inch cores, we wet the edges of the core to avoid a ceased finished roll. Rework will consist of rewinding returned material onto cores that don't have canola oil residue. I don't think that canola oil will impact the quality of the product but was deemed a contaminant on their end so i'm quite lost here.



FurFarmandFork

    Food Safety Consultant, Production Supervisor

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,264 posts
  • 590 thanks
206
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon, USA

Posted 05 May 2017 - 03:19 PM

Hmmm. So the canola oil is a normal processing aid that you apply at your facility? Or was it spilled onto the cores/web accidentally at some point?


Austin Bouck
Owner/Consultant at Fur, Farm, and Fork.
Consulting for companies needing effective, lean food safety systems and solutions.

Subscribe to the blog at furfarmandfork.com for food safety research, insights, and analysis.

jdominguez

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 05 May 2017 - 03:25 PM

Hmmm. So the canola oil is a normal processing aid that you apply at your facility? Or was it spilled onto the cores/web accidentally at some point?

yes processing aid for our facility.



FurFarmandFork

    Food Safety Consultant, Production Supervisor

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,264 posts
  • 590 thanks
206
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oregon, USA

Posted 05 May 2017 - 03:43 PM

Gotcha, thank you for the clarification.

 

This sounds like it may be a simple communication issue with your customer's QA team. I would have considered oil residues found on web cores to be a contaminant in my last position, simply because it wasn't normally found on them, and our specification for the web didn't identify that that would be an expected thing to see. Is your customer aware that this is a processing aid in your facility, was the expectation clear that this is considered normal? Just finding this on the floor would tell me that something got spilled on it in transit or at your warehouse, hence the risk of contamination.

 

I would still be hesitant to use this material, because it's an unknown variable. I might have accepted it as a customer had this exchange gone through:

 

Email from me to jdominguez:

Hi Film Supplier. We've placed the last shipment on hold for what looks like some sort of liquid contamination on the cores. Please schedule return and replace the product. See attached pictures.

 

From jdominguiez to me:

Hi Customer.

Thanks for the email, looking at the pictures that staining you see wasn't due to a contamination event, but as part of our normal process. It's canola oil that's used as a process aid to keep your product from creasing during winding. While there is a more apparent stain on this core than normal, this is a common thing to see in our products and does not affect the quality of the material. As for safety, the canola oil is applied at our plant and maintained as a food contact substance. Attached is the SDS/supplier CoA for the canola oil that we use, and some pictures of the process to show how it can happen in our process.

 

The pictures of your process will help a lot, as well as some examples from other products you make that look similar. They key here is that unless they understand and can document that this isn't evidence of unsanitary handling of the material, they can't use it.


Austin Bouck
Owner/Consultant at Fur, Farm, and Fork.
Consulting for companies needing effective, lean food safety systems and solutions.

Subscribe to the blog at furfarmandfork.com for food safety research, insights, and analysis.

Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users