Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

HDPE Bottle Molding Leak Detection

packaging verification HDPE quality leak detection

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 FurFarmandFork

FurFarmandFork

    QA Manager/FS Blogger

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 492 posts
  • 236 thanks
35
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 15 May 2017 - 07:15 PM

Alright packaging folks, pass on to me what "industry standard" is in this case. I'm evaluating suppliers of HDPE 1 gallon bottles and getting into discussions over leak detection verification.

 

From my perspective, a leak in a bottle is an unacceptable defect, and since they're using an in-line leak detector to reject bottles, monitoring/verification of this equipment should be similar to metal detection with checks at start/end of shift at minimum and if the equipment is found to not be working all material since the last good check should go on hold for rework or disposal.

 

Is this fair? I've had problems with regrind-contamination leaks in the past that should have been caught by the leak detector tolerances and I'm getting strict on this issue. What verification procedures/intervals have you all seen? What % of bottles with leaks above the detector's tolerance are expected to make it past this step?


  • 0

For discussions related to food safety, production, and agriculture. Check out my blog at http://furfarmandfork.com/.

 


#2 Tony-C

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,974 posts
  • 800 thanks
168
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Koh Samui
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 16 May 2017 - 07:22 AM

I would say that I largely agree, but quarantined product when equipment is found to be not working properly could be rechecked before condemning it to rework or disposal.

 

Based on previous complaint target levels I would say the standard for bottles with leaks making it past the detector should be something better than 1/10,000.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

#3 daveh11

daveh11

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 10 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 19 May 2017 - 08:17 AM

I would agree with Tony, Last good check would be used as a marker to impound / Quarantine rather than dispose of, depending on the equipment verification frequency.

 

I would also recommend, if not already doing so, that your test equipment checks are suitable to verify across the full range of your specification. This type of test equipment usually uses pressure decay over a given test duration. So your test samples need to incorporate the smallest detectable example.


  • 0





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users