Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Can there be oPRPs after process steps identified as CCPs?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 rams

rams

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 7 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 07 August 2017 - 06:12 AM

Can there be oPRPs after the process steps which have been identified as CCPs. For example after pasteurisaton (which is a CCP), whether the subsequent steps like filing, packing, storage be treated as oPRPs?


  • 1

#2 Charles.C

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 12,226 posts
  • 3162 thanks
339
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 07 August 2017 - 08:07 AM

Can there be oPRPs after the process steps which have been identified as CCPs. For example after pasteurisaton (which is a CCP), whether the subsequent steps like filing, packing, storage be treated as oPRPs?

 

As per the stepwise iso22000 procedure, the conclusion typically depends on whether any process step is -

 

(a) associated with a significant BCPA hazard ?

(b) if answer to (a) is yes, then the decision as to whether an oprp or a CCP exists is determined by applying 7.4.4 (a-g) and using appropriate differentiation criteria.

 

So, in principle, the answer to yr OP is maybe.


  • 1

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

#3 rams

rams

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 7 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 07 August 2017 - 12:04 PM

Thank you for your info


  • 0

#4 frawat

frawat

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 15 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Peru
    Peru
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peru
  • Interests:Quality Management
    Food Safety
    Statistical Thinking
    Six Sigma

Posted 13 August 2017 - 01:14 AM

Yes, also because the hazards at the subsequent steps could be different from the hazard at the CCP. Example pasteurization with re-contamination during packing. 

Kind regards,

Francis


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users