Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Employee Initials vs. Employee ID # for Records

records legal regulatory

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 tezza07

tezza07

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 17 posts
  • 3 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 21 September 2017 - 01:29 PM

Good morning,

 

I've had some discussions with colleagues (also in food packaging manufacturing environments) and a question has come up that we can't settle on, so bringing it to you fine folks for your expertise and input. If you have an employee who refuses to sign their name to anything (records, training records, etc.) and will only write their employee ID #, does this pose a problem from a legal/regulatory standpoint? For example, they complete sanitation on their equipment and they write their employee ID # in the box instead of initialing as would normally be expected, is this still acceptable as long as the provision is there in the documentation that employee ID # is acceptable? (say what you do, do what you say) 

 

I've tried to find information on this on the web and either it doesn't exist or I'm not very good at using search engines  :tongue:

 

Thank you!

 

 



#2 BrummyJim

BrummyJim

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 329 posts
  • 116 thanks
25
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South West
  • Interests:Motorbike gone now. Only the dog to walk!

Posted 21 September 2017 - 03:31 PM

This seems an unusual issue. Do you keep a signature record so you can check if a signature is correct and traceable to the person? If so, this wouldn't work as anyone can use this person's ID# to sign off a document. It's still a little iffy even without a signature record.

 

You might want to explain to this person the risks of using such a copyable way of registering their completion of a record.



#3 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 822 posts
  • 176 thanks
51
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:We specialize in helping small to mid-sized food companies to develop & implement SQF Systems to achieve certification in a relatively short period of time. Our operational area includes all of the America's with 99% of our business in the USA.

Posted 06 October 2017 - 09:10 PM

Anybody can write down an ID, use signature or initials and keep a record of signatures and initials for comparison. There is no control with just writing down an ID number.


Warm regards,

 

Glenn Oster

 

SQF Registered Consultant - Certified for 29 FSC's

Serving clients in: USA, Costa Rica, Panama & Caribbean Islands

International Toll-Free: 800-546-1452

 

http://www.linkedin.com/in/getgoc

 

www.GlennOsterConsulting.com


#4 FurFarmandFork

FurFarmandFork

    QA Manager/FS Blogger

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,001 posts
  • 463 thanks
67
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 09 October 2017 - 03:02 PM

Anybody can write down an ID, use signature or initials and keep a record of signatures and initials for comparison. There is no control with just writing down an ID number.

I agree with this as best practice. But I will always disagree that someone can't approximate someone else's signature or initials with just as much fakery as an ID.


QA Manager and food safety blogger in Oregon, USA.

 

Interested in more information on food safety and science? Check out Furfarmandfork.com for more insights!

Subscribe to have one post per week delivered straight to your inbox.

 


#5 romanfj

romanfj

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 11 posts
  • 4 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 May 2018 - 05:51 PM

If you have a signature log that cross-references the employee ID number to their signature, I would not expect an SQF auditor to turn it into an audit finding.



#6 MsMars

MsMars

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 107 posts
  • 29 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female

Posted 14 May 2018 - 06:38 PM

Without more information, it sounds a little fishy to me, like there is/was a bigger issue with this employee than just a documentation discrepancy... never heard of anyone NOT wishing to use their signature/initials.  :yeahrite:

I agree with BrummyJim - talk to the employee about why they prefer this method, the gravity of the documentation they are signing off on, and the risk it involves.







0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users