Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

FSSC 22000 version 4.1 new changes

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

tharinduth

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 46 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Sri Lanka
    Sri Lanka

Posted 06 December 2017 - 09:39 AM

Hi all,

 

Wishing you a good day.

 

I have read FSSC 22000 version 4.1 and need to clarify what are the exact changes to be done?

 

Because mostly I picked small changes of words and simplifications.  

 

I really looking for professional's consultation on this matter and your comments are much appreciated.

 

Thank you.



Thanked by 1 Member:

Ehab Nassar

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 137 posts
  • 147 thanks
24
Excellent

  • Egypt
    Egypt
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 December 2017 - 08:06 AM

Hi tharinduth ,

 

the attached excel file contains a comparison between FSSC 22000 version 4.1 and FSSC 22000 version 4.

 

 ,

also below link for  presentation about FSSC 22000 version 4.1 new requirements 

 

http://www.fssc22000...version-4.1.pdf

 

Requirements for FSSC 22000 version 4 upgrade audits

 

http://www.fssc22000...rade-audits.pdf

 

 

 

BR,

Ehab

Attached Files



qualityfishgirl11

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 51 posts
  • 2 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 21 December 2017 - 09:22 PM

Why was there version 4, then 4.1? I assume we need to use 4.1?

We do ISO 22000:2005 and ISO 22002-1:2009 for our scheme, are there changes to these that I need to be aware of too?



JD@KetoSkream

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 25 posts
  • 7 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 10 January 2018 - 12:02 AM

Why was there version 4, then 4.1? I assume we need to use 4.1?

We do ISO 22000:2005 and ISO 22002-1:2009 for our scheme, are there changes to these that I need to be aware of too?

 

ISO 22000:2005 is under revision and an updated version is expected this summer (I'm pretty sure that timeline is already like six months behind what I saw a year ago, so maybe later even). It says they're reviewed every five years, though, so I suspect if there are no changes made then it must say as 2005...? Which is odd. But whatever. As far as I can tell, 22002-1 does not have an update in the works. 

 

https://www.iso.org/...0-revision.html





Share this


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users