Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Walnut Hand Scrub and "Tree Nut" Allergen Statement?

allergens hand scrub

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Sgoat

Sgoat

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 08 August 2018 - 06:59 PM

Hello, My facility is currently looking into a new, more effective hand scrub that contains walnut. Our facility already processes tree nuts (coconut, which is considered a tree nut in the US), so we have a "contains tree nuts" allergen statement. My question is, if we add this walnut hand scrub, would it pose an allergen cross contamination issue if we already have that allergen declared on the label? The fact that the declaration is "tree nuts" and not "walnuts" specifically is what's throwing me off.

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated! Thanks so much for your help :) 



#2 Scampi

Scampi

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,425 posts
  • 406 thanks
81
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 08 August 2018 - 07:45 PM

My first thought........what are you making that you need an exfoliating hand scrub???

 

It would appear no issue labeling wise

from the FDA..."The following are considered "tree nuts" for purposes of section 201(qq). The name listed as "common or usual name" should be used to declare the specific type of nut as required by section 403(w)(2)."

 

However, I would do some swabbing first on folks hands..........and the scrub really should be followed up with a normal hand soap 

Which tree nuts are included in Canada's list of priority food allergens? The tree nuts included are almonds, Brazil nuts, cashews, hazelnuts, macadamia nuts, pecans, pine nuts (pignolias), pistachio nuts and walnuts. Peanuts are part of the legume family and are not considered a tree nut.Sep 11, 2017


#3 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 873 posts
  • 188 thanks
60
Excellent

  • Panama
    Panama
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:We specialize in helping small to mid-sized food, logistic and packaging companies to develop & implement SQF Systems to achieve certification in a relatively short period of time. In addition we offer a low-cost highly effective eConsultant Subscription, SQF Compliance Reviews and Internal Auditor Training. Don't let our location throw you off - Our market is the United States.
    Call us to discuss your needs 800-546-1452

Posted 08 August 2018 - 08:47 PM

There is another thread here on shell scrubbers. The potential impact is nil.  The shell fragments are for all intents and purposed completely sanitized of allergen - which for the most part is the meat of the walnut and not the shell anyway.  There should not be an issue here.  The shell scrubbers make for excellent scrubbers, but at a cost and for some a potential irratant.


Warm regards,

 

Glenn Oster

 

SQF Certification & Implementation Consultant

Serving clients in: USA, Centro America & Caribbean Islands

International Toll-Free: 800-546-1452

USA Skype Number: 772-646-4115

 

www.GlennOsterConsulting.com


#4 smgendel

smgendel

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 20 posts
  • 6 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 09 August 2018 - 02:23 PM

In the US the use of the "contains tree nuts" label in NOT legal.  You need to declare the actual nut:  "Contains coconut".

 

As far as the walnut issue, you are correct that you need to consider cross-contact.  You need to document that the hand scrub is, in fact, free of walnut protein.  That would mean using an assay that is validated for use with the specific product - not just an assay aimed at foods.   If there is no walnut protein, than there is no concern.  The important thing is to document the situation, don't assume anything.







0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users