Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Junk Food Adverts 'face Tv Ban'

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,836 posts
  • 1363 thanks
884
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 18 November 2004 - 12:50 PM

Adverts for junk foods would not be shown on television before 2100GMT as part of a government plan to tackle obesity. Manufacturers and advertisers will be urged to agree a voluntary code of regulation, according to reports in two Sunday newspapers.

The proposal is contained in the government's Public Health White Paper, to be published this week.

Other measures include a new "traffic light" labelling system identifying unhealthy foods.

Read Full Story

###

Regards,
Simon

Edited to add a link to the Executive Summary of the Public Health White paper:
Executive summary (pdf 1.24MB)


Edited by Simon Timperley, 18 November 2004 - 01:01 PM.

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Bonno

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 34 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Derbyshire
  • Interests:Web design, Football (football team linked above), Music, Reading, Films - usual stuff really.<br /><br />Would like to give golf a try but have not got around to it yet.<br /><br />I have also heard that having weekends off is quite good, so intend to give that a try soon and see if I like it!

Posted 18 November 2004 - 07:28 PM

Hi Simon,

I feel like I've already replied to something similar to this in the past....?


I have a few ideas for tackling obesity.....
Power cuts from 6:00pm to 9:00pm every night (kids can't play on games consoles or watch TV),
A free football, basketball, netball or tennis set etc for every child.
The streets, safe for children to play on,
Petrol at £200 per gallon so people walk everywhere and finally a weather control machine so that it's always sunny instead of always raining

Bonno
:doh:


Your mind is a parachute, it doesn't work when it's closed....Frank Zappa

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,836 posts
  • 1363 thanks
884
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 18 November 2004 - 07:59 PM

Tony sign him up! :beer:

Regards,
Simon


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


yorkshire

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 380 posts
  • 6 thanks
4
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yorkshire
  • Interests:Antiques<br />Buying Georgian houses<br />Fine Food &amp; Wine<br />Luxury Cars<br />(Mostly dreams)

Posted 29 November 2004 - 12:10 PM

Having read the proposal for the nutrient model, see attached, I believe that it is does not aid the consumers' understanding of a healthy, balanced diet.

e.g. if a high fat snack food was graded it would score 10 points for fat content. If I decide to fortify the product with calcium or iron I could score -10 points, or more. This would put this high fat product into the GREEN / HEALTHIER category which means "EAT LOTS". Surely not what the Government intended.

The traffic light system is too simplistic; what we need is improved education of consumers so they understand what they are eating.

Attached Files


"Have the courage to be ignorant of a great number of things, in order to avoid the calamity of being ignorant of everything." Sydney Smith 1771 - 1845 www.newsinfoplus.co.uk

Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,836 posts
  • 1363 thanks
884
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 29 November 2004 - 08:31 PM

The traffic light system is too simplistic; what we need is improved education of consumers so they understand what they are eating.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I like the idea in principal but you're right Yorky (red, amber, green) is too simplistic. That seems to be the consensus of opinion. However, if you take a look at the FSA's website it appears there are a variety of 'food signposting' concepts under consideration.

http://www.food.gov....postingconcepts

http://www.food.gov....v/signpostpress

If they can develop a system that's both simple and accurate then I'm all for it. As well as helping consumers it may force the food industry to develop healthier products. It's definitely worthy of discussion. :thumbup:

Regards,
Simon

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users