Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Microbial test sampling plan for fast food

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic
- - - - -

dedi

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 November 2007 - 12:59 PM

Hi,
I need help in calculating the number and quantity of samples required for microbial testing in a fast food processing plant ( pizzas, burgers, Salads ).
anyone has a sampling plan, matrix etc.



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,831 posts
  • 1363 thanks
881
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 20 November 2007 - 09:41 PM

Hi,
I need help in calculating the number and quantity of samples required for microbial testing in a fast food processing plant ( pizzas, burgers, Salads ).
anyone has a sampling plan, matrix etc.

Can anybody help Dedi out with how to go about creating a sampling plan?

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5664 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 20 November 2007 - 11:21 PM

Dear Dedi,

It will depend on what you are sampling for, the specifications (customer?)(which often in practice define a sampling plan, eg m/M/c types), tolerances, lab. capacity if internal, production volume, process, must be officially approved/validatable or can be "rule of thumb", cost, etc.

One standard practical reference is the ICMSF volume - title something like "Sampling for Microorganisms in Foods.
Also the usfda "Microbiological methods" (=BAM) is on line and has sampling advice, particularly for pathogens from memory.

Many companies use "house" procedures basedon experience (as you request maybe) (typically lower sampling density) for general purposes and then official methods if a problem occurs.

Rgds / Charles.C

ps - you might find this thread helpful (or depressing :smile: )

http://www.ifsqn.com...logical methods


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,831 posts
  • 1363 thanks
881
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 25 November 2007 - 08:23 PM

Dear Dedi,

It will depend on what you are sampling for, the specifications (customer?)(which often in practice define a sampling plan, eg m/M/c types), tolerances, lab. capacity if internal, production volume, process, must be officially approved/validatable or can be "rule of thumb", cost, etc.

One standard practical reference is the ICMSF volume - title something like "Sampling for Microorganisms in Foods.
Also the usfda "Microbiological methods" (=BAM) is on line and has sampling advice, particularly for pathogens from memory.

Many companies use "house" procedures basedon experience (as you request maybe) (typically lower sampling density) for general purposes and then official methods if a problem occurs.

Rgds / Charles.C

ps - you might find this thread helpful (or depressing :smile: )

http://www.ifsqn.com...logical methods

Thanks for that Charles. Dedi is this helpful?

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


cazyncymru

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • Banned
  • 1,604 posts
  • 341 thanks
130
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 December 2007 - 04:41 PM

http://www.chilledfo...dance_Ed_12.pdf


try this link........i know their european regs, but they work for us!


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5664 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 01 January 2008 - 06:43 AM

Dear Cazx,

Useful link and certainly considerably more helpful than many.

It well explains / emphasizes the relevance of HACCP in the food chain including the various manufacturing stages plus highlighting the division between safety and process hygiene (following the EC’s thinking).

Unfortunately it seems to run away from discussing the statistical meaning / limitations of the presented mMc regulations / guidelines (a not unusual decision). Difficult topics but nonetheless important IMO. There are frequent footnoted appearances of this statement –

The Food Business Operator should decide the testing frequency based on HACCP principles, testing should be used to verify HACCP.


Yes, I agree, but are the various (eg “n=5 family) choices acceptable in this respect ?? (eg what average percentage of wrongly passed defective lots is satisfactory?) ? If not, how should the compromise between statistics and ‘practicality’ be made? A question of further validation I suppose. :smile:

Regards / Charles.C

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Charles Chew

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,178 posts
  • 54 thanks
15
Good

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Food, food and food!

Posted 10 January 2008 - 06:27 AM

Many companies use "house" procedures basedon experience (as you request maybe) (typically lower sampling density) for general purposes and then official methods if a problem occurs.


Hi Charles,

As always, the issue of "Uncertainty in Measurement" in all analytical procedures is a sticky problem to deal with.

Regards
Charles Chew

Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com



Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users