Dear Tony,
To summarise, regarding the aspect discussed above, i think this document is seriously flawed.
A third comment and perhaps unrelated is that, AFAIK, this table has never appeared in print again.
And maybe this is also why we never heard from HeatherP again.!
I hope most of the above relates to yr query. What was yr own viewpoint ?
Rgds / Charles.C
Hi Charles
I agree it is seriously flawed and confusing
For example the table on page 11 indicates mild/seldom/occassional & moderate/seldom hazards are controlled by OPRP's. The OPRP's were more likley to be the yellow shaded boxes with more severity/probability. The ones he has indicated as OPRP's are more than likely PRP's.
Also on page 20 he has only staff hygiene as a PRP whereas, as i'm sure you are aware, the standard requires these to be considered:
- construction and lay-out of buildings and associated utilities
- lay-out of premises, including workspace and employee facilities
- supplies of air, water, energy and other utilities
- supporting services, including waste and sewage disposal
- the suitability of equipment and its accessibility for cleaning, maintenance and preventative maintenance
- management of purchased materials, supplies and handling of products
- measures for the prevention of cross contamination
- cleaning and sanitizing
- pest control
- personnel hygiene
Maybe it was just an example of a PRP
Regards,
Tony