Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

ISO 22000 or BRC Certification

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic
- - - - -

J Young

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 16 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 13 May 2010 - 11:26 AM

Hi all

I work in a very small dairy and we are looking to upscale our accreditation from SALSA to either ISO 2200 or BRC. I would be grateful for any comments on the pros-cons of both and which one would be most suited for the future? Are there differences or would blue chip customers accept one or other?

hopefully you can help me make the right informed choice.

thanks
Justin



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,835 posts
  • 1363 thanks
881
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 13 May 2010 - 06:05 PM

I would probably recommend BRC. Can you tell us who your customers are - UK only, Export only (where), both? Also are your customers in the retail supply chain?

If you can provide some more details I would be more confident in making a recommendation on which standard to choose and why.

Regards,
Simon


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


J Young

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 16 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 14 May 2010 - 07:59 AM

Thanks Simon

We would be mainly supplying either UK food factories as an ingredient or direct to retail. We do very rarely export to Japan although they are not insisting on ISO.

Would ISO be accepted instead of BRC?

regards Justin



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,835 posts
  • 1363 thanks
881
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 14 May 2010 - 08:39 AM

Based on your customer portfolio I would definitely go for BRC Justin.

Regards,
Simon


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 15 May 2010 - 06:31 AM

Dear J Young,

If you want to see some of the differences, can find useful discussion/links in these threads (and others in the miscellaneous standards forum)-

http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__22111

http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__34114

One obvious implementation difference will be seen after you study the standards -
ISO 22000 requires extended knowledge regarding HACCP related material due to the re-focused philosophy in the standard. Whether this change ultimately has any operational benefit to the user is a matter of (various) opinion(s), it has certainly succeeded in generating confusion probably out of all proportion to the intended significance.

As implied by Simon, BRC and the GFSI associated standards originated through customer driven scenarios, the first esp.from UK whereas ISO 22000 is a relatively "independent" proposition although the latter characteristic is now becoming debatable following the modifications enforced on it vis GFSI acceptability criteria, eg PAS effects.

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Zeeshan

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 499 posts
  • 224 thanks
25
Excellent

  • Pakistan
    Pakistan
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Karachi, Pakistan
  • Interests:QMS, TQM, FSMS, HMS (Halal Management System), IMS (Integrated Management System), Training Programs Management, Performance Management

Posted 17 May 2010 - 10:08 AM

Decision for a reasonable Certification Scheme mainly depends on following factors:
1- Customer/Regional demand.
2- Comprehensiveness of standard.

Inline with first factor, since BRC is more demanding standard esp. in UK and European region, a retailer of this region would obviously prefer BRC Certification.

Inline with second factor, IMEX, BRC is more comprehensive than ISO 22000. It has included almost all aspects of ISO 22000 and ISO 9001 (QMS).

Regards:
Zeeshan.


Edited by Zeeshan, 17 May 2010 - 10:09 AM.




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users