CONTAMINANTS IN COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEMS
ISO 8573 is the international quality standard for compressed air systems. Along with BRC, Primus, SQF and others, ISO 8573 identifies particles, water, total oil, gases and microorganisms as common contaminants in compressed air systems. These types of contaminants can come from a variety of sources. If contamination is present, then facilities will receive out of specification results. Then the detective work begins. If the tests do not meet the purity limits the user has set, then troubleshooting and remediation must take place. Perhaps a filter is inadequate or needs to be replaced, or there may be black iron piping in the distribution after the last filter. Regular testing allows users to identify the type of contamination that is affecting their system and helps to narrow down the timeline in which the contamination began. The BCAS recommends monitoring programs for compressed air systems with both direct and indirect impact on products (2020). SQF Edition 9 recommends a risk-based testing schedule, with a minimum of annually (2021).
Particles can be categorized as either viable or nonviable particles. Viable particles, or microorganisms, will be discussed later in this section. Non-viable particles include everything from rust, to dust and dirt, sand, and metal oxides to fragments of o-rings and tubing. The main sources of particle contamination are improper maintenance, damaged or inadequate filtration, rust, particle shedding hoses, and insufficient purging time after system alteration. Users sometimes choose filtration based more on pricing than on efficacy, which can prevent them from meeting their air quality requirements. Filters must be appropriate for the industry, have the correct efficacy, and should be changed at appropriate intervals as recommended by the manufacturer.
Maintenance performed on the system can cause particulate matter to accumulate down the lines. If there are additions to the distribution line, test results will sometimes show metal shavings or other debris left over from installation. It is essential to properly purge your compressed air and gas lines before taking a test - particularly if there has been maintenance or installation of additional lines, sampling or end user ports. Cycle purging can be used to flush out the lines and ensure that no particle contamination reaches the end product when the system is in use.
Water vapor in a compressed air system can lead to many issues down the line including microbial contamination and the degradation of pipes, o-rings, and tubing. The main sources of water contamination come from ambient air, accumulation in drops, dead ends or traps, leaks in the system, and rubber tubing.
There are large quantities of water in ambient air, particularly in the summertime as humidity levels rise. The intake air is generally high in moisture content. Because the air coming from the compressor is generally quite a bit warmer than the ambient air, it can often cause condensation (Henly, 2016). Even the smallest amount of water in the air over time can accumulate and pool in places like drops, dead ends, and traps. When water accumulates like this, it creates a very inviting environment for microorganisms to grow and thrive. It is critical to regularly empty and monitor these areas in your system. Dryers work to remove moisture from the air, but if there are no dryers employed, you can expect the compressed air to be quite wet.
Leaks are also a source of water vapor contamination in compressed air systems. Whenever the pressure drops, it creates a suction around the area of a leak that pulls ambient air into the system. If the leak is after the dryer or filtration, it can lead to water vapor contamination that impacts the air quality.
Oil can be present in compressed air systems as both vapor and as aerosol. It's important to work with an accredited laboratory that can analyze both types of oil and provide Total Oil results. Aerosols more commonly enter a system from the compressor itself. New installations or lack of proper maintenance can be a source of oil aerosol in the system.
Many food and beverage manufacturers are transitioning to oil-free or food-grade oil compressors to avoid excess machine oil that could be harmful to the end-products. However, even if your system is “oil-free”, testing regularly for oil contamination is still of critical importance. Oil vapor can enter the system from the intake air. Process solvents and cleaning solutions can be another source for oil vapors in the air that appear quite frequently in compressed air tests. Accredited compressed air tests can pinpoint these, and, once identified, procedures can be changed or altered.
Always purge after maintenance or changes to the compressor or distribution piping and ensure that filtration is appropriate for the system and purity requirements. Oil contamination can be detrimental to end products and should be carefully monitored.
Viable particles, or microorganisms, are often a headliner in the food industry. Dangerous microorganisms like Salmonella or E. coli can put reputations and bottom lines at risk. Manufacturing facilities have controlled environment processes and workflows, but it is essential to monitor that those are appropriate and happening at the correct intervals. Process fatigue happens in all industries and can allow dangerous microorganisms to pass through even the most thoughtfully designed cleaning protocols. Microorganisms are also very small in size and particles as small as 2 microns can squeeze through the compressors inlet filter and spread throughout the compressed air system (Atlas Copco, 2021).
Testing for bacteria, yeast, and mold allows manufacturers to understand what kinds of risks and where these organisms may be coming from. Further identification can also allow a user to dial into the root cause of this contamination.
Microorganisms can flourish in systems that are already contaminated by water, oil, and other particles. Contaminated systems allow microorganisms to grow abundantly. Infrequent or inadequate maintenance can allow microorganisms to be introduced to the system and then subsequently spread throughout it. Additionally, if hygienic processes are not set in place and followed carefully, compressed air systems can end up blowing particulate matter and microorganisms onto food products (Brownlee, 2020).
Gaseous contamination is of concern to those using modified atmospheric packaging or creating products that use gases for taste or color. In addition to testing for purity, it’s also important to test for contamination in the gases.
Much like compressed air, pure gases are susceptible to particle, water, oil, and microbial contamination. Gaseous contamination, such as too much oxygen in a nitrogen line can impact products negatively and force users to throw away or discard the product. Gas contamination can enter the system from the intake, distribution piping leaks, or from a malfunctioning compressor.
SAMPLING POINTS AND FREQUENCY
The goal of compressed air testing is to find contamination in the system if it exists to an extent that could be damaging to the end product. Because of this, a single sample one time a year does not adequately represent the health and quality of the compressed air system. Though annual testing is all that is technically required per SQF and BRC, it's recommended to test on a risk or maintenance-based schedule.
Finding contamination in the system is the only way to get to the source and remediate the problem. Quarterly testing or testing before and after maintenance helps to ensure that all the scheduled maintenance and protocols are adequate and functioning as expected. There are some cases where filters need to be replaced more often, or changes to the workflow need to be implemented.
Compressed air contamination can come from many sources, and it's important to have an in-depth understanding of your system and its risks. Though each system is unique, the table above is a helpful tool in investigating different types of contamination. Regular testing is the best way to first identify contamination, and then track down the source so it can be remediated. The experts at Trace Analytics are here to help make sampling and understanding your reports easy. With over 3 decades of compressed air testing experience, the AirCheck team can walk you through common sources of contamination as well as help troubleshoot your sampling techniques. For more information on compressed air testing, please contact us at email@example.com.
Atlas Copco. (2021).
What contaminants can be found in compressed air? Atlascopco. Atlas Copco. https://www.atlascop...aminants-in-air.
BCAS urges best practice compressed air guidance is maintained during lockdown. BCAS urges best practice compressed AIR guidance is maintained DURING LOCKDOWN. https://www.bcas.org...ractice-84.aspx.
Brownlee, B. (2020).
Keep contaminants out of food and beverage processing air supplies. Keep Contaminants Out of Food and Beverage Processing Air Supplies | Compressed Air Best Practices. https://www.airbestp...ng-air-supplies.
Heney, P., & 4 Reasons Your Air Compressor Has Water In It – Air compressor repair knowledge at your finger tips. says: (2016).
Why is there water in my compressed air system? Pneumatic Tips. https://www.pneumati...ssed-air-system.
- Sep 21 2021 02:44 PM
- by Simon
Sources of Microbial Contamination
Areas of contamination can generally be attributed to the following: the quality of air drawn into the compressor, wear particles, and storage and distribution systems. When it comes to food operations, manufacturing or packaging, micro-environments change and exist just like our own environments. This is the result of multiple cycles (seasonal) and daily interactions. Environments such as compressed air systems need to be monitored for many reasons including seasonal changes, microbial growth cycles, and consumer and employee safety. Every breath you take is contaminated with particles: viable and non-viable. On average, these viable microorganisms, like bacteria, yeast, and mold, make up 102 to 106 colony forming units for every 1000 liters of outdoor air (3). Contaminated environmental air is processed into compressed air for food packaging, dusting, and mixing. Unless appropriately sized filters and dryers are placed before each point-of-use, there is a substantial risk of ambient air contaminating the compressed air. The air receiver and system piping are designed to store and distribute compressed air. As a result, they will also store the large amounts of contaminants drawn into the system. Additionally, piping and air receivers cool the moist compressed air, forming condensate which causes damage and corrosion, and creates a favorable environment for microbial growth.
Risks and Compressed Air Regulations
Each facility and product has unique risks depending on its contact with compressed air. Risk assessments and hazard analyses (HAACP) should be conducted to create an appropriate monitoring plan. It’s important to consider the impact compressed air has on product quality, safety, or legal compliance. By investing in a monitoring plan that tracks the bio-burden of high-risk points-of-use and routinely testing for particles (viable and non-viable), water and oil contaminants, a trend analysis can distinguish patterns and correlations in data.
ISO 8573-1:…9 is an international standard that lays out the structure for testing and analyzing these types of issues in compressed air specifically. While there are no mandated microbial specifications or limits, ISO 8573-7:2003, focuses on the sampling method to report microbial bioburden (4). Using this technique, a facility can begin to investigate the microbial status of the system routinely by using a third-party accredited laboratory. ISO 8573-1:…9 is often referenced by the Safe Quality Food Program (SQF), British Retail Consortium and British Compressed Air Society (BRC and BCAS) and the Food Drug Administration (FDA). The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) endorse food quality schemes made popular by SQF (8th edition), which often references ISO methods.
Microbial contamination in compressed air can result in facility closures and product recalls. Both incidences can cause loss of integrity to the brand name. Once confidence is lost, it’s a very challenging endeavor to get back. Utilizing this efficient test method mitigates risks for facilities.
The Importance of Testing for Microorganisms in Compressed Air
Microorganisms can indicate a potential presence of pathogens associated with wastewater, poor hygiene, and loss of protocol integrity. A microbial analysis of total plate count and the identification of indicator organisms is immeasurably important when considering food safety and quality. “Indicator organisms” are those microorganisms that typically demonstrate the potential presence of pathogens, faulty practices that may affect safety or shelf life, or that the food or ingredient is unsuited for an intended use.
Microbial plate counts are a snap shot of a moment in time in the compressed air system at that particular point-of-use. Routine monitoring allows a better picture of the system over time.
Unexpected high microbial counts can be identified by examination of samples at critical control points and by facility inspection (5).
Total plate counts allow end-users to understand how many colonies are found in their compressed air sample. The limitation to these counts is the lack of microbial differentiation. Even if the reported plate count remains unchanged over time, the microbes themselves may be different. For example, a total plate count of 4 colonies in January could reveal different organisms than a plate count of 4 colonies in June. These different types of microbes might influence taste, smell, and or general quality. Therefore, further identification or differentiation is of value to trend analysis, food scientists, and quality officers.
Presumptive identification is an efficient mode of lab analysis used to differentiate the colony forming units on the compressed air test plates. Presumptive identification relies on the color, colony morphology, growth on selective media, Gram stain and other enzymatic reactions to identify a bacterium, yeast or mold. This is often sufficient for use in general surveys or monitoring plans to determine the presence of indicator organisms. However, some presumptive identifications have limitations that require confirmatory techniques via molecular, immunological or biochemical tests for definitive identification.
Examples of Presumptive Identification for Select Microorganisms
One type of presumptive technique is chromogenic identification for bacteria or yeast. Chromogenic microbiological media uses enzymes, chromogen substrates, and secondary metabolites as a color indicator for early identification. This chromogenic agar is selective and differential to certain organisms. This allows their identification via growth, color and or inhibition. Chromogenic agarose allows for rapid and reliable detection of bacteria like, Listeria, Salmonella, Shigella, E.coli and coliforms. They are identified by colony color on their specific chromogen agar and can be read as quickly as 24 hours post incubation. While there are limitations to chromogenic identification, it is a quick and economic way to screen for specific pathogenic organisms.
Coliforms are groups of rod-shaped, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming bacteria that are likely to show up if protocols for sanitation and hygiene fail. They are not a type a bacterium, rather a group of similar bacteria that are commonly found in soil, surface water, plants and the intestines of warm blooded animals. Some common types of coliforms are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter species.
E. coli, a type of facultative anaerobic coliform and Gram-negative rod, is readily found in all human intestines (enteric), the environments, soil and water. One of the harmful strains of E.coli called E. coli-O157 produces a secondary metabolite called Shiga Toxin (STEC). This harmful strain of E. coli can cause abdominal cramping, diarrhea, dehydration, and occasional vomiting.
Listeria is a facultative anaerobe, Gram-positive, non-sporing rod. Listeria monocytogenes is the causative agent of listeriosis, the disease characterized by flu-like illness and other more serious conditions, including meningitis, pneumonitis, and septicemia. While many species are non-pathogenic, Listeria monocytogenes is a well-established food poisoning risk. It can be found in uncooked meats and vegetables, as well as unpasteurized dairy products. Its ability to cause disease is due, in part, to the bacterium’s ability to survive and grow at refrigerated temperatures.
Salmonella is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobe, rod-shaped bacterium. Salmonella is one of the most common causes of food poisoning in the United States. Usually, symptoms last 4-7 days and most people get better without treatment. Symptoms of the disease are diarrhea, fever, abdominal cramps and vomiting. Salmonella is killed by cooking and pasteurization. Sources of Salmonella are particularly found in reptiles, amphibians, and birds. Outdoor compressed air units are often susceptible to salmonella contamination due to bird and animal feces.
Shigella is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobe, non-spore-forming rod. Animals and humans who contract Shigellosis shed the bacterium in their feces. It can take as little as 100 bacterial cells to cause symptoms. Though rare in developed countries, contaminated food or water are sources of infections in developing countries and crowded living conditions with poor sanitation. Symptoms include sudden abdominal cramping, fever, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting.
Candida is a yeast and an integral part of the natural environment and human microbiota. Invasive yeast infections associated with food are less common than foodborne mold infections, and are almost always linked to dairy products (9). Some Candida strains are commonly found in raw fermented dairy products, and can grow in ultra-pasteurized cow’s milk. While symptoms of Candida infections range from person to person, most result in bowel inflammation. Candida also impacts the taste quality of the food or beverage.
Save time, money, and energy with compressed air testing
No regulatory bodies demand that plants test more than once a year for particles, water, total oil, and microbial contaminants. Yearly testing, though budget-friendly, does not provide the most effective and useful data for trend analysis. It does not account for seasonal or maintenance changes. Yearly testing, however, does provide a snapshot of the compressed air system and meets the current requirements of SQF, ISO 8573-1, and BCAS.
For example, in one of the most highly publicized bacterial strains to hit the news in the United States, numerous outbreaks of E. coli-O157 and E. coli-O26 contaminated lettuces and ground beef were reported to cause illness, so much so, expansive recalls and multistate investigations were conducted (7,8). Millions of dollars of time, revenue, product loss and reputation were lost at the end of 2018. By testing biannually or quarterly, a trend analysis can reveal cycles and seasonal changes in a compressed air system. Investing in a monitoring plan that tests compressed air systems more frequently saves time, money, and energy by catching contamination outbreaks before product quality is affected.
- Environmental air is contaminated with microorganisms. If in compressed air systems, proper filtration and processing is not employed, the air that is compressed will also be contaminated.
- Even if CFU count does not change, the type of organisms might and so might product quality
- Asking what organisms are in your compressed air is beneficial to trend analysis and food safety
- Chromogenic agar can rapidly test for indicator organisms such as but not limited to, Coliforms, E. coli, Listeria, Salmonella, Shigella and Candida.
- Increasing annual microbial compressed air monitoring to biannual or quarterly testing can yield beneficial results
Written by: Maria Sandoval
Maria Sandoval has over 15 years of experience in Microbiology and Molecular Biology. Her field work includes analyzing extremophiles isolated from the depths of Lake Baikal in Russia to the 50km exclusion zone of Chernobyl. Additionally, she’s worked alongside the CDC with DSHS analyzing and diagnosing patient microflora. Her tenure with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Department of State Health Services and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center has made her a leading expert in microbial testing. As Trace Analytics’ Microbiologist, she is responsible for microbial testing and procedural development.
1. Chaib, F., Davies, O.L. (2015, December 3). WHO’s first ever global estimates of foodborne diseases find children under 5 account for almost one third of deaths. Retrieved from http://www.who.int
2. Imdad, A., Retzer, F., Thomas, L.S., McMillian, M., Garman, K., Rebeiro, P.F., Deppen, S.A., Dunn, J. R., & Woron, A.M. (2018). Impact of culture-independent diagnostic testing on recovery of enteric bacterial infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 66, 1892-1898.
3. Prussin II, A.,J., Garcia, E.B., & Marr, L. C. (2016, March 6). Total virus and bacteria concentrations in indoor and outdoor air. Environmental Science and Technology Letter, 2(4), 84-88.
4. Sandoval, M. (2018, July 11). Compressed air: Choosing the correct microbial sampling method. Retrieved from https://www.ifsqn.com
5. Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council. (1985). An evaluation of the role of microbiological criteria for foods and food ingredients. Retrieved from https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov DOI: 10.17226/372
6. National Institutes of Health (n.d.). Vitamin K. Retrieved from https://ods.od.nih.gov
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019, January 9). Outbreak of E.coli infections linked to romaine lettuce. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019, January 9). Outbreak of E.coli infections linked to ground beef. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov
9. Benedict, K., Chiller, T.M., and Mody, R.K. (2016, April 13). Invasive fungal infections acquired from contaminated food or nutritional supplements: A review of the literature. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 13(7), 343-349.
- Mar 27 2019 12:55 PM
- by Simon
SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION:
There are a variety of sources that can introduce oil into a compressed air system. Oil lubricated compressors, which are prevalent in manufacturing facilities, use oil to seal, lubricate, and cool during the compression stage. Oil vapors can also be introduced from worn seals, o-rings, or compressors that are overheating and allowing vapors to escape through the system. Because oil is used so abundantly in the compressed air process, the potential for contamination is elevated. Additionally, cleaning solvents and connection glue can also produce oil vapor contamination.
Inappropriate or inadequate filtration can also allow for excess oil to pass through the system. Steve Volkman, of Zorn Compressor & Equipment, explains that an inadequate grade of filtration might not remove the oil properly. If the application requires a 0.01 micron filter, and a 0.1 micron filter is used, then excess oil can pass through the system and impact the product.
Atmospheric air can contribute to oil contamination as well. This air contains anywhere from 0.05 mg/m3 to 0.5 mg/m3 of oil vapor (CAGI, 2012). Car exhausts, industrial processes, facility cleaning, and other environmental factors all contribute to oil vapor in the atmosphere. The compressor intake brings in these hydrocarbons and they can easily pass through the system. For example, intakes near an excess of car exhaust can face a higher risk for contamination.
RISKS OF OIL CONTAMINATION:
Contaminated compressed air systems can result in a decrease of productivity, loss of product, recalls, and even complete shutdown for system cleaning and re-validation. When excess oil is present into the compressed air system, it has adverse effects on the machinery and the end-product. Excess oils could potentially impact the operation of tools or the maintenance of the system (Volkman, 2018). The distribution system is also at risk as excess oil creates a nutrient-rich environment that is particularly suitable for microbiological growth, and can cause damage to the distribution system or equipment (Wilkerson, 2018).
Food that is contaminated with oil will have a bad taste and odor and could affect the consumers’ health. Oil can also create a displeasing visual appearance to the product. Even food packaging manufacturers need to be aware of the effect that oil residue has on their products. If oil is deposited onto the food packaging, then it can transfer to the food product which compromises its quality. No consumer wants to find industrial oil in their coffee in the morning.
A notable case of oil contamination occurred in Germany in 1997. The infamous “oil in the sausage” finding brought attention to the importance of filtration and compressed air testing in the food industry. A consumer-packaging expert released findings of mineral oil in vacuum-wrapped sausages (Smith, 2007). The system lacked filtration and the compressed air had not been tested. As a result, BCAS/BRC Code of Practice recommends testing twice per year to ensure the safety of the product (Smith, 2007).
REGULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS
There are four major organizations that have identified compressed air as a Critical Control Point that must be monitored. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), British Compressed Air Society (BCAS), the British Retail Consortium (BRC), and the Safe Quality Food institute (SQF) all point to the importance of monitoring compressed air quality, as it is a source of potential product contamination.
ISO 8573 is an internationally recognized standard that defines the major contaminants of compressed air. It’s widely used throughout the food and beverage industry and acts as a common language between manufacturers, suppliers, and laboratories. To comply with ISO 8573 classes 1 and 2, both oil vapor and oil aerosol must be considered and monitored. Total oil is defined by ISO 8573 to be “a mixture of hydrocarbons composed of 6 or more carbon atoms”. ISO 8573 also mentions organic solvents which are defined as, “mixture of one or a combination of the following identified groups: alcohols, halogenic hydrocarbons, esters, esters/etheralcohols, ketones, aromatic/alfatic hydrocarbons, and oils”. This type of contamination can result from cleaning products and shows up in oil analyses performed by GC/MS.
ISO 8573-1:2010 defines purity classes for oil based on different risk levels. Total oil is the combination of liquid, aerosol, and vapor. Ensure that your laboratory has the capabilities to test for total oil, rather than just one portion of the contaminant, as they can all have a significant impact. Keep in mind that liquid oil is typically only sampled for when catastrophic failure is suspected, wall flow is present, or total oil results are greater than 5 mg/m3.
BCAS Food and Beverage Best Practice Guide 102 divides specifications between direct, and indirect contact. For direct contact with products, total content oil should be less than or equal to 0.01 mg/m3. If the compressed air is used indirectly with products, the total oil content can be less than or equal to 0.1 mg/m3.
Each individual manufacturer should perform a risk assessment and understand their product to determine the appropriate purity classes. If a company is unsure of what purity classes they should test to, a third-party accredited laboratory can provide baseline or diagnostic compressed air testing to help provide the necessary data to build a monitoring plan.
REMOVING OIL FROM FOOD SYSTEMS:
Many food manufacturers attempt to prevent oil contamination by using oil-free air compressors. Although this is an excellent way to reduce risk of oil contamination, this does not remove the possibility of oil contamination altogether (Shanbhag, 2018). Oil-free compressors do not use oil lubrication, so they greatly reduce the risk, but do not eliminate the need for filtration and testing. Making the switch from a traditional compressor to an oil-free compressor does not account for oil legacy in piping systems (Volkman, 2018). If a system previously used industrial oil, there could be traces of oil left in the piping system. Filtration and regular testing are still an important part of a quality monitoring system.
Another way to protect end-products from dangerous oil contamination is to use food-grade oil in the compressed air process. Unfortunately, for many manufacturers, this is not a cost-effective solution. Traditional industrial oil only needs to be changed 1 or 2 times a year, however food-grade oil requires changing 3-4 times a year and is much more expensive (Compressed Air Systems, 2014).
Both oil-free compressors and food-grade oil greatly reduce the risks of oil contamination, but they should also be used in tandem with appropriate filtration. Paired with frequent maintenance, adequate filtration is the best way to remove oil contamination from a compressed air system (Volkman, 2018). System operating manuals provide projected lifespans for filters and it is critical to change them at the appropriate intervals. As previously mentioned, ensuring the appropriate grade of filtration is another important step in removing oil contamination.
TESTING FOR OIL CONTAMINATION:
ISO 8573 purity classes 1 and 2 require a combination of oil aerosol and oil vapor. Check to make sure that your laboratory provides combined test results. This standard points to infrared spectrometry or spectrometry gas chromatograph to test for oil aerosol. At Trace Analytics, LLC, oil aerosol is determined by gravimetry. This is an alternative, validated method that allows Trace to determine whether oil aerosol contamination is present at > 99.5% recovery at a greatly reduced cost. Filter membranes are pre-weighed, used to collect the compressed air sample, and then analyzed.
Oil vapor is determined using a Gas-Chromatography Mass-Spectrometry instrument (GC-MS). Compressed air is passed through a charcoal tube. The charcoal absorbs oil and can then be extracted by the laboratory for analysis.
Organic solvents are not defined by ISO 8573 as oil vapors and therefore will not be represented in a Pass/Fail. However, it’s worth considering the impact these could have on the product. Because of this, it’s recommended to work with a lab who can test for and report organic solvents, in addition to oil vapors.
Because the risks are so great, it is essential for manufacturers to employ proper filtration and to regularly test their compressed air. Since oil-free compressors and food-grade oil substitutions do not prevent atmospheric or cleaning solvent oils from affecting the system, it is essential to employ preventative measures.
By Jenny Palkowitsh, Trace Analytics, Marketing Manager.
Arfalk, Erik. “What Does It Really Mean to Be 'Oil-Free'?” The Compressed Air Blog, 2015, www.thecompressedairblog.com/what-does-it-really-mean-to-be-oil-free.
“Air Treatment Myths.” CAGI - Compressed Air and Gas Institute, 2012, www.cagi.org/working-with-compressed-air/mythbusters/air-treatment-myths.aspx#!prettyPhoto.
Mistry, Vipul. “Transitioning to Oil-Free Compressed Air.” Compressed Air Best Practices, Air Best Practices, 2013, www.airbestpractices.com/technology/air-compressors/transitioning-oil-free-compressed-air.
Shanbhag, Nitin G. “Three Types of Food-Industry Compressed Air Systems.” Hitachi America, 2018, www.hitachi-america.us/ice/wecompressair/assets/hitachi-three-types-foodindustry-compressed-air-systems.pdf.
Smith, Rod. “Oil in the Sausage.” Compressed Air Best Practices, Aug. 2007, pp. 11–15.
“Sources of Contamination.” Wilkerson , 2018, www.wilkersoncorp.com/9EM-TK-190/9EM-DryerIntroduction.pdf.
“The Use of Air Compressors with Food Grade Oil & Lubricants.” Compressed Air Systems, 21 Feb. 2014, www.compressedairsystems.com/use-of-air-compressors-with-food-grade-oil.
Volkman, Steve. “Oil Contamination in Compressed Air Systems - Zorn Compressor & Equipment.” 10 Oct. 2018.
- Jun 29 2020 05:55 PM
- by Simon