The diligent process of implementing a food safety management system automatically improves food safety and quality performance and certification to a food safety management system standard such as ISO 22000 can help reassure customers that an organization has implemented a system for the management of food safety in line with its policy. But this only works if we can have confidence in the certification.
This is where ISO/TS 22003 can play a critical role, according to Jacob Faergemand, Co-Convenor of the group of experts who developed the document. The technical specification defines rules on, for example, auditor competencies and audit duration that CBs have to implement.
In the latest edition of ISO/TS 22003, the most important change – and one to which the CB will need to adapt – is the shift from a “qualification-based approach” to a full “competence-based approach” for the definition of auditor competence requirements.
To support the drive for improvement ISO have published a new handbook compiling two key standards (ISO/TS 22003 and ISO/IEC 17021) thus providing a single source of information for Certification Bodies certifying food safety management systems.
The new handbook combines:
- ISO/TS 22003, which outlines requirements for bodies issuing certifications to ISO 22000 on food safety management systems (FSMS)
- ISO/IEC 17021, which sets generic requirements for bodies carrying out audits
December 2013 Interview with Jacob Faergemand
- Jun 29 2020 06:44 PM
- by Simon
]ISO 22000, the International Standard on food safety management systems was published in 2005. Since then, the markets' needs have evolved and in September this year there are plans to revise the standard.
As part of the revision process ISO are seeking the input of stakeholders involved in the food chain that use, implement, or make reference to ISO 22000.
In order to remain as relevant as possible, ISO standards are reviewed every 5 years to assess the need for a revision. The committee behind ISO 22000, ISO/TC 34/SC 17, is currently running a review until mid-June to collect as many comments as possible on the standard before the revision process is set to start in September.
If you represent industry, consumers, governments, regulators, laboratories, or any other organization active in the food industry, what do you like about the standard, what do you think needs to be changed and did you have any problems implementing it?
If you wish to suggest improvements for the next version of ISO 22000 visit the ISO website to find out how you can submit your comments: http://www.iso.org/i...m?refid=Ref1842
About ISO 22000 – Food safety management systems
ISO 22000 was designed to be used by any organization across the food chain, including both large and small businesses. The standard creates a framework for establishing principles, procedures and guidelines to manage food safety while helping to develop cost-effective management in the industry.
Furthermore, it provides practical tools needed for managing food safety as a single coherent system. The ISO survey on certification reveals that the number of certificates for ISO 22000 has increased by 20% between 2011 and 2012 and the standard is now certified to in 142 countries.
- Jun 29 2020 06:45 PM
- by Simon
Published in September 2005, ISO 22000 food safety management systems – requirements for any organization in the food chain, is the new kid on the food block. The product of an ongoing collaboration between the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the food industry, it aims to be an international, auditable standard defining food safety management along the entire food chain – “to ensure that there are no weak links”, as the ISO website explains. The intention is that ISO 22000 will sit alongside the other existing food safety schemes and complement them by bringing a common language and understanding of how food safety should be managed all along the food chain.
ISO 22000: IN A NUTSHELL
According to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 22000 is intended to ensure that there are no weak links in food supply chains. The standard “can be applied to organizations ranging from feed producers, primary producers through food manufacturers, transport and storage operators and subcontractors to retail and food service outlets – together with inter-related organizations such as producers of equipment, packaging material, cleaning agents, additives and ingredients....
“ISO 22000 specifies the requirements for a food safety management system in the food chain where an organization needs to demonstrate its ability to control food safety hazards in order to provide consistently safe end products that meet both the requirements agreed with the customer and those of applicable food safety regulations.”
PLANTING A SEED
“The kernel of the ISO 22000 idea was to have a HACCP-type standard, with a basis of ISO 9001:2000 – in other words, to [build on] existing systems and shape them into a clear, understandable, auditable structure for the food and drink industry,” says Sarah Davies of Geest, the leading fresh prepared foods and produce company in the UK and a major international player. Davies chaired the UK drafting committee on ISO 22000.
While ISO 22000’s main difference from other standards lies in its scope and international applicability, it also differs from standards such as BRC and IFS, in that it does not offer a prescriptive list of requirements for good practice.
Instead, in acknowledgement of the fact that it would be impossible to name all requirements for all types of food businesses, it puts the onus on the food company to define the best practice that is most relevant to it.
The working group that developed the standard involved members from 14 different countries and representatives from a number of other organizations, including Codex Alimentarius and the Confederation of the Food and Drink Industry of the European Union (CIAA). Given the global nature of the food industry, it was important that ISO 22000 be developed with international and cross-industry consensus. According to Davies, this approach represents the standard’s greatest strength.
“The drafting process was very positive. It was hard work, but it was great to be working with people from around the world who had the same passion we did,” she says. “ISO 22000 followed the standard development process: there were a lot of comments and each one had to be addressed by the working group. It’s an international standard and it’s come through all the voting processes the stronger for it.”
ISO 22000 AS A BUSINESS TOOL
One of the benefits of running ISO 22000 is that it offers synergies to companies who have already implemented other ISO management systems. For example, ISO 22000 uses the same systematic approach as ISO 9001 and the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System standard, making it easy to incorporate it into an integrated risk-based management system.
For Denise Graham of Tetley, one of the companies chosen to run ISO 22000 as a pilot study, its value as a business tool was fundamental to their decision to deploy it.
“Tea bags are one of the lowest risk food products: they’re long lasting, dry, contained in paper and they’re not ingested. While we currently have a HACCP system in place, it’s not verified independently as we felt the existing standards, such as BRC, were aimed at higher risk food products.
However, we’ve implemented other ISO standards – including ISO 9000 Quality Management System, 14001 Environmental Management System and now ISO 18001 Occupational Health and Safety Series – and we considered it important that food safety was managed using our current approach to managing our business, so that it could be integrated into our other systems.
We were able to integrate ISO 22000 much more easily into our policy and systems. Our people are used to working with BRC and ISO standards. If they weren’t, it might have been more difficult for us.” Tetley plans to migrate to ISO 22000 later in the year, and is currently in the process of recruiting a new quality manager to manage this project."
Implementation is a key issue for any firm seeking to roll out a new quality standard, and ISO 22000 is no exception. Although Graham admits that Tetley’s own adoption of the standard in draft format was made much easier by the fact that she and her staff were familiar with both ISO and other food-related standards, she says that compliance costs should not necessarily prohibit smaller companies.
“The whole implementation process lasted six to eight months, which was reasonable. It would have taken less time but we decided to link it in with a communications and marketing campaign involving all our 600 employees.
The cost depends on your level of preparedness. Our transition wasn’t difficult – we felt we needed to review our business anyway as we were moving into higher risk products such as herbal teas, but I don’t feel the compliance cost was onerous. The requirements are scope, policy, management review and audit requirements. It’s not hard to pick up a standard and find the synergies but the fact that it fits in very well with other ISO standards, and that we were all trained in ISO and HACCP, made it easier still.”
RECIPE FOR SUCCESS?
Good international heritage and a broad bedrock of support in the drafting stage are both important selling points for ISO 22000, but for Richard Jones, health, safety and environment manager at Kellogg’s Manchester (UK) plant, ISO 22000’s success will depend on its take up across the food industry.
“ISO 22000 changed its emphasis during drafting,” he says. “There were subtle changes that were made to the format of the document, and of its position within the array of food management and safety-related standards already out there. Initially it was positioned as a 9000 equivalent for the food industry but the emphasis changed by the time it got to final revision to becoming a global HACCP standard.
This may be right for the UK – with standards such as BRC already in place, the perceived need for 9000 had been receding recently, for right or wrong reasons. Although it is still seen as an essential part of due diligence in other places such as the Benelux, it was clear that a customer-specific standard had become the primary need for some manufacturers.
The fact that ISO 22000 is a HACCP-equivalent is the key to its success. It gives the food industry a useful trade tool for global business. Whether it becomes successful or not in the UK though, will be down to whether it gets taken up by small and medium sized businesses. In the UK there are still a lot of food manufacturers that fit into this category. To be a successful standard means medium sized businesses buying into it and using it for due diligence and as a way of unlocking global supply chains,” says Jones. “How much value it delivers depends on the clients to whom they’re selling their product. It is too early to say what kind of buy-in it will get.”
Jones adds: “The food sector is a very dynamic and proactive international industry: it is important that retail procurers and companies ask themselves whether the standard is relevant not just for customer and consumer protection but also as a mechanism for putting all our food management safety practices in place.
All standards are released as an initial revision and are always a compromise as they have to balance the interests of European and global members. ISO 22000 will get revised, but as a first standard, it’s very good.
One of its other strengths is that, in its support of HACCP, it has duly tackled pre-requisite programmes and brings clarity and definition to them.
At Kellogg’s, our standards are shaped by top-down corporate initiatives as well as recognition of UK and European compliance, best practice and market drivers. We recognize the ISO 22000 as a significant HACCP standard, which may be appropriate for some markets. Kellogg’s Manchester plant was the first manufacturer in the world to gain certification to the BRC global food standard (issue 4). Strategically, we are always looking to strengthen our due diligence and best practice.
The UK has always been a strong supporter of ISO standards as part of management systems and compliance. It will be interesting next year to see what sectors are first to adapt to it,” Jones concludes. “If applied as intended, it should assist food safety development.”
MAKING A CHANGE
If you already have a food safety management system in place, then migrating to ISO 22000 shouldn’t be a drain on time and money, and could give you the competitive edge, or so Wales-based food packaging manufacturer Bemis found when they carried out a two-day pilot with BSI in August.
Says David Jones, quality systems manager at Bemis’ plant in Swansea: “Whereas BRC is quite prescriptive, ISO 22000 looks beyond that by asking you to look at your internal system and decide how you will achieve your aims. I don’t think it will be a problem for us, but it will require us to change our mindset from BRC, where you are told whether to do this, or do that.”
Bemis, which exports 80 per cent of its product to continental Europe, now plans to apply for ISO 22000 as soon as it can, says Mike Bird, plant manager at Swansea: “We had the report back from BSI a couple of weeks ago and it was good – there were three or four small non-conformities, which we’ll have no problem sorting out. It’s not that we feel having ISO 22000 will instantly lead to greater profits, but it’s always good to be one step ahead of the competition and lead the way. In terms of customers, they will vary from country to country, but food hygiene will become more and more important and we just want to reinforce our system so that we have everything in place to adapt to these changing demands.”
Since this pilot, meanwhile, New Season Foods Inc in the US has become the first company to sign up for ISO 22000 certification with BSI Americas. According to Mark Frandsen, president: “New Season Foods Inc decided to pursue ISO 22000 because it is specifically designed for the needs of food processing. The integration of food safety with the best practices of manufacturing and management fits with our company’s operating expectations. ISO 22000 certification will serve as a clear signal to the market that New Season Foods Inc will consistently meet customers’ product requirements. ISO 22000 certification will set the company apart from other food manufacturers.”
A SAFE FUTURE FOR FOOD
Davies expresses similar cautious optimism that ISO 22000 will gain the same recognition as its ISO stable mates in the pantheon of industrial standards. It will need time and probably some follow-up work to bed itself in.
“ISO 22000 is an accessible document in that it only lays down the criteria: you make of it what you choose and it’s entirely up to you how you show evidence of compliance,” she says. “I’ve seen some beautifully formed, very small management systems and some ugly, great, expensive ones too: size is no barrier to having a good management system.”
For Davies, though, ISO 22000’s success or otherwise will be demand-led: “BRC, the current standard for food manufacturers serving retailers in the UK, is not like a business standard in that it is a retailer-specified standard. Representatives from the retailer arena did attend the drafting stage, but full acceptance has not happened yet.”
ISO 22000 does specify food safety system requirements, though it does not set out prescriptive “good practices”. And as Davies points out, “there is no way on earth that you could do this, as the document would have to be huge – and this is one concern from retailers. But other [national and industry] standards can be used within its context and more documentation is likely to follow.
At the moment, ISO 22000 is just like ISO 9001 in that it is not industry specific, rather a large horizontal document,” she adds, “but there will be specific vertical documents published in due course relating to specific parts of the food chain as the standard develops.” For Davies, if ISO 22000 gets judged on the principles it sets out to address, then its success should be assured: “Hopefully, ISO 22000 will lead to more action in your typical food management system. It makes you look at your cost processes and critical control points: a safe manufacturing environment is not negotiable if you’re manufacturing food and drink products. At the end of the day, it’s about taking the principles of HACCP and using them within a good management system. Will this improve the profitability of a food business? I work for a food manufacturer and I know that you don’t negotiate on food safety. If anything can adversely affect a business, it is issues with food safety.”
First Published in British Standards Magazine (October 2005 Issue)
BSI - Launch of ISO 22000 Food Safety Management Systems Standard: Integrity in the Food Chain
ISO 22000 The auditable standard for Food Safety Management Systems which sets out requirements for any organisation in the food chain was released by the International standards organisation on the 1st September 2005 and was adopted in the UK as the national standard for food safety on the 8th September published as BSEN ISO 22000:2005.
In the UK from January 2006 hygiene regulations will require food businesses to have a HACCP system and ISO 22000 is the vehicle to demonstrate such a system is in place.
ISO 22000 is not a replacement or substitute for ISO 9001. It meets a different need but does align to and can be integrated into ISO 9001 management systems. It fills the gap between meeting direct customer requirements and satisfaction (ISO 9001) and ultimate consumer and end user requirements necessary to ensure food is safe at the time of human consumption (ISO 22000).
For more information on the standard and route to registration visit www.bsi-uk.com/Food+Safety/index.xalter
- Jun 29 2020 06:52 PM
- by Simon