Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Temperature / time rate for cl. botulinum spores hatching

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Esther

    Member

  • IFSQN Member
  • 232 posts
  • 17 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:La Coruña- Spain
  • Interests:Local and international food law; food industrial processes; food safety management systems;GMP; lean manufacturing; share knowledge

Posted 14 February 2010 - 12:35 PM

Dear members

This is a very specific question. I have been a time and I still am looking for an answer or rather an argument.

This question is in line with thermal sterilization and also in line with somethig SaRaRa posted last july 2009:

THERMAL STERILIZATION OF SOME PRODUCTS:

FOOD / Fo (time required for the total destuction of microorganisms in minutes)

Beans / 7-15 min
Spinach / 4-5 min
Tomato / 0,7-1 min
Corn / 9-15 min
Mushroom / 6-10 min
Meat / 6-8 min
Fish / 2,5-8 min
Chicken / 6-8 min
Condensed milk / 5-6 min


As SaRaRa said, these times are related to a temperature of 121ºC.

If I am not wrong, the main concern in vegetables cans is clostridium botulinum spores. It is said that the minimun treatment to produce a safe product ( vegetable can )is that that reach a Fo=3 as minimun. That is to say, by applying Fo=3 we can say that all cl. botulinum spores are destroyed to an safe level.

I suggest the following: if I get all the cl. botulinum spores to be hatched before entering the thermal sterilization then I can conclude that I will need a lower temperature to kill all the c. botulinum vegetative forms. This is why I am very very interesting in knowing the temperature/rate need for cl. botulinum spores hatching.

This question arose after being in a vegetable can industry. There is a product whose process can not reach a temperature higher than 110ºC otherwise the product would be the same.

The company has been doing this product for years; they have a product library and analysis from the final product been done after the use by date. The life time is two years. Everything is OK, seems like they are doing it well but we need to find an argument or explanation.

Any opinion, link or advice will be of great help.

Thank you very much in advance

Bet regards
Esther



Hongyun

    Finger Lickin' Good

  • IFSQN Member
  • 241 posts
  • 20 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Singapore
    Singapore
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 14 February 2010 - 02:59 PM

Hi Ester,

Even if the equipments are not capable of reaching beyond 110 C, it is still possible to destroy the spores, by extending the holding time.

But your method might work too. Searched on the Wikipedia and found the Tyndallization method:
 

Tyndallization is an old process for sterilizing food. It is still occasionally used.

A simple, effective, modern sterilizing method is to heat the substance being sterilized to 121°C for 15 minutes in a pressure cooker; see autoclave. If a pressure cooker is unavailable and sterilization proceeds instead using unpressurized heating to 100°C in boiling water, the heat will kill the bacterial cells but the viability of bacterial spores may survive. In this latter case the Tyndallization process can be used to destroy the spores. The process is named after its inventor, the 19th century scientist John Tyndall. Tyndallization essentially consists of boiling the substance for 15 minutes for three days in a row. On the second day most of the spores that survived the first day will have germinated into bacterial cells. These cells will be killed by the second day's heating. The third day kills bacterial cells from late-germinating spores. During the waiting periods over the three days, the substance being sterilized is kept at a warm room temperature; i.e., a temperature that is conducive to germination of the spores. Germination also requires a moist environment. When the environment is conducive to the formation of cells from spores, the formation of spores from cells does not occur. The Tyndallization process is generally effective, but its reliability is not considered 100% certified. It is not often used today, but it has applications in sterilizing some things that cannot withstand pressurized heating, such as gardener's seeds. It is not necessary to bring the temperature all the way up to 100°C to kill bacterial cells.



"World Community Grid made it possible for us to analyze in one day the number of specimens that would take approximately 130 years to complete using a traditional computer."

- Dr. David J. Foran, professor and lead researcher at The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.




Join our LinkedIn Group! >> <<

Jean

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 429 posts
  • 7 thanks
4
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Female

Posted 15 February 2010 - 06:50 AM

Dear Esther,

Hope the link below will be useful

http://www.sofht.co....clostridium.htm


Best regards,

J

Only the curious will learn and only the resolute overcome the obstacles to learning. The quest quotient has always excited me more than the intelligence quotient. Eugene S Wilson

SaRaRa

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 186 posts
  • 13 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:21 AM



Esther

    Member

  • IFSQN Member
  • 232 posts
  • 17 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:La Coruña- Spain
  • Interests:Local and international food law; food industrial processes; food safety management systems;GMP; lean manufacturing; share knowledge

Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:40 AM

Thank you all very much

I am going to read all your links and I will be back to you.

One thing, the problem is not that the equipment is not able to reach temperatures higher than 110ºC, the problem is that by doing so the product will significally change.

If I not wrong, regardless how long you can extend the holdng time you will needd a mnimun temeprature from safety point of view. By reading some articles I did conclude that the minimun temperature for cl. botulinum spores is 110ºC. Is this figure familiar to you?

On the other hand, I need a firm argument for the next certification audit.

Best regards
Esther



cazyncymru

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • Banned
  • 1,604 posts
  • 341 thanks
130
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 February 2010 - 12:58 PM

Botulinum Cook

The heat treatment given to a low acid canned food (having
a pH higher than 4.2) sufficient to inactivate 1012 spores of
Clostridium botulinum. This heat treatment is called the Fo value
and it is equivalent to a process of 3 mins at 121ºC, 10 mins at
115ºC or 32 mins at 110ºC.


CCFRA run a 5 day course on the principles of canning which is excellent.

Caz x



Sujit

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 23 February 2010 - 02:53 PM

Dear Esther,
Could you share the product which requires 110°c. In my experience it could be green peas which could get smashed and become paste like.
Regards,
Sujit



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,223 posts
  • 1288 thanks
608
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 26 February 2010 - 04:50 AM

This question arose after being in a vegetable can industry. There is a product whose process can not reach a temperature higher than 110ºC otherwise the product would be the same.

The company has been doing this product for years; they have a product library and analysis from the final product been done after the use by date. The life time is two years. Everything is OK, seems like they are doing it well but we need to find an argument or explanation.
Bet regards
Esther


I would expect them to have a comprehensive validation study that has challenged the process and found it to be effective.

Regards,

Tony




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users