Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Validation vs/= Verification

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Esther

    Member

  • IFSQN Member
  • 232 posts
  • 17 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:La Coruña- Spain
  • Interests:Local and international food law; food industrial processes; food safety management systems;GMP; lean manufacturing; share knowledge

Posted 15 December 2005 - 06:06 PM

Hello everybody

Title Validation vs/= Verification

I know that this question has been approached before on the forum but teh most I reas, more questions come into my head.


Hello everybody
I know that this question has been approached before on the forum but the most I read, the most confused I get

If you carry out microbiological analysis on the end product

a)are you verifying your HACCP system? ( it is supposed that you have validated the control measures and limits before implementing them )

b)are you making validation of control measures ? ( it is to say, making sure that the scientifid and technical information your HACCP is based on is right ?

c)are you making validation of the HACCP system ( or another food safety control system ?

It would be grateful ti get an opinion fron a FSMS auditor as well-
AND what about if you carry out calibration of equipment against national or international standards ? ( the same three questions )
Thank you
Regards
Esther



Franco

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 752 posts
  • 15 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Italy
    Italy

Posted 16 December 2005 - 06:44 AM

If you carry out microbiological analysis on the end product


Why are you doing the analysis ?
Because you want to increase your knowledge of the contamination of the end product.
Hence you are uncertain, aren't you ?
Why are you uncertain ?
If you know the answer, you know what you're doing (validation or verification)
If you don't know the answer ... that's your next step.

Hint: validations of controls may be performed by governmental organizations such as FDA and standardized for a particular business, verifications of HACCP plan are usually performed by each plant.

Edited by Franco, 16 December 2005 - 06:45 AM.

An ancient Chinese proverb teaches that the person who waits for a roast duck to fly into their mouth must wait a very long time.

Charles Chew

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,178 posts
  • 54 thanks
15
Good

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Food, food and food!

Posted 17 December 2005 - 02:48 PM

Esther,

Franco is leading you to the right direction. :beer: ....but slowly and i have a feeling he wants you to understand the difference in a practical way.

It would be grateful ti get an opinion fron a FSMS auditor as well-


And, what makes you think they will..........when FSMS Auditors generally give you "improvement suggestions" but NEVER show you "how"

I am taking a GUESS here but those people in this forum who have provided the larger chunk of professional views and comments are unlikely to be auditors but rather FSMS consultants and/or FSMS Managers in their own rights and fields. :thumbup:

Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com

Franco

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 752 posts
  • 15 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Italy
    Italy

Posted 19 December 2005 - 06:38 AM

Franco is leading you to the right direction. :beer: ....but slowly and i have a feeling he wants you to understand the difference in a practical way.


Yes Charles, you're right. I was trying to let Esther find her way to the solution.

An ancient Chinese proverb teaches that the person who waits for a roast duck to fly into their mouth must wait a very long time.

Witch

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 66 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Germany
    Germany

Posted 19 December 2005 - 01:55 PM

If you carry out microbiological analysis on the end product

a)are you verifying your HACCP system? ( it is supposed that you have validated the control measures and limits before implementing them )


Hallo Esther,
microbiological spot checks show you whether the HACCP-plan works or not = verification
But befor doing that, you should validate your examinations.
An example: if a hazard might be bacillus cereus, it might not be useful to look for aerobic viable counts. Can you find the Bacilli, if they are there? An useful test should be adding the bacilli into the product and show, that your test would identify them. = Validation
But (like advices for children... ;) ) do not do this without the help of somebody who is competent, otherwise your production line might be contaminated for longer... :dunno:
Christmas greetings!
Andrea


Franco

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 752 posts
  • 15 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Italy
    Italy

Posted 21 December 2005 - 11:25 AM

But befor doing that, you should validate your examinations.


The key factor is the time.
Validation takes place prior to operation and its aim is to demonstrate the "food safety capability" of the process (i.e. microbiological analysis on the end product).
Verification takes place during and after the operation and its aim is to demonstrate that the intended level of control has actually been achieved (i.e. microbiological analysis on the end product).
Monitoring is done to detect any failures in the control measures (i.e. recording of pasteurization time -temperature data).
It may happen that validated processes need only monitoring and no verification at all, since it has been demonstrated that their "food safety Cp and Cpk" meet the requirements.

An ancient Chinese proverb teaches that the person who waits for a roast duck to fly into their mouth must wait a very long time.

Esther

    Member

  • IFSQN Member
  • 232 posts
  • 17 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:La Coruña- Spain
  • Interests:Local and international food law; food industrial processes; food safety management systems;GMP; lean manufacturing; share knowledge

Posted 25 December 2005 - 06:46 PM

Esther,

Franco is leading you to the right direction. :beer: ....but slowly and i have a feeling he wants you to understand the difference in a practical way.


And, what makes you think they will..........when FSMS Auditors generally give you "improvement suggestions" but NEVER show you "how"

I am taking a GUESS here but those people in this forum who have provided the larger chunk of professional views and comments are unlikely to be auditors but rather FSMS consultants and/or FSMS Managers in their own rights and fields. :thumbup:



Hello ALL

This is my comment to you all, kind repliers

You all are right and I agree.

These questions came to my head after reading some articles about Verification and VAlidation.
To be honest, that difference was and is quite clear to me ( so far ) but I started wondering which one it is to auditors.

Believe, my last intention is to bother you, all members, with silly ( apparently ) questions

After reading all your answers I keep on my first idea

So thank you very much

Esther


Franco

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 752 posts
  • 15 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Italy
    Italy

Posted 02 January 2006 - 07:17 AM

Believe, my last intention is to bother you, all members, with silly ( apparently ) questions


Esther, I think there are no silly questions, but there are silly people who never ask questions.
Go on asking whenever you like. This is a good habit for you and for all the SDF community.

An ancient Chinese proverb teaches that the person who waits for a roast duck to fly into their mouth must wait a very long time.

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 September 2006 - 08:01 PM

Dear All,

Hope Esther doesn't mind me borrowing her thread.
I came across this short US explanation of HACCP validation / verification from the US / FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) viewpoint while browsing .
Attached File  Validation_and_Verification___FSIS_Approach.ppt   49.5KB   168 downloads
It's not so high-powered as the preceding posts in this thread but seemed quite elegant and understandable to me so here it is. Hopefully it is not inconsistent with other more detailed resources already available in this forum.
(It was extracted from an immense compilation of FSIS items, many on-line, at
http://www.fsis.usda...tions/index.asp )

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


zepinto

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 13 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Portugal
    Portugal
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:PORTUGAL

Posted 22 November 2006 - 09:47 AM

Hello to you all,

One of the best approach to distinguish VER from VAL is the questionnaire proposed by Huss, FAO (2003):

You validate when you answer to this questions:
· are the right things done?
· will the system work when put into practice?

You verify when you ask:
· are the things done right?
· are they done as they were planned to be done?

regards, Jose



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,826 posts
  • 1363 thanks
880
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 23 November 2006 - 08:11 PM

Hello to you all,

One of the best approach to distinguish VER from VAL is the questionnaire proposed by Huss, FAO (2003):

You validate when you answer to this questions:
· are the right things done?
· will the system work when put into practice?

You verify when you ask:
· are the things done right?
· are they done as they were planned to be done?

regards, Jose


That's fantastic Jose; it must be a good explanation even I can understand it. :rolleyes:

Cheers,
Simon

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Charles Chew

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,178 posts
  • 54 thanks
15
Good

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Food, food and food!

Posted 27 November 2006 - 09:09 AM

[/quote]
You verify when you ask:
· are the things done right?
· are they done as they were planned to be done?[quote]

Hello Jose,

Just playing devil's advocate.

When you verify - i.e. "are the things done right and are they were planned to be done"

Question: What will happen if what they had planned to do was not right in the first place.....and if the verification planning was wrong, how could we have an effective validation. :dunno:

Regards
Charles Chew


Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com

Sankara narayanan

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 159 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UAE

Posted 28 January 2007 - 08:11 AM

:thumbup:

Hello to all,

A simple way of putting it would be:

A food item for example can be verified

A bomb can only be validated and not verified

Hope this helps

A.Sankara Narayanan

Jenny

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 40 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 29 January 2007 - 02:35 AM

Dear All:

Last year, USDA checked our HACCP plan and said we need to verify what we mentioned under justification for environmental control program. We set to swab Listeria Mono environmental program every 3 months. He asked us how you can be sure every 3 months is sufficient because three months is the least minimum requirement from FSIS. He asked us to validate our justification. What we've done was we designed our analysis to swab every week for whole 3 months. We wil use the lab data as validation. And after that, verification process will be followed.

Jenny



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 29 January 2007 - 08:53 AM

Dear Jenny,

Thanks for interesting comments.
You didn’t specify the product but this looks like a very expensive project even if you have in-house lab facilities.
I don’t quite see why the USDA would not accept yr following their own (presumably ??) validated guideline ? Or perhaps they have some specific reason to believe there is a likelihood of significant L.mono contamination in yr environment? Perhaps this is food for the space program or babies ? (I believe most RTE foods mainly have a tolerance for L.mono. now, does this mean you are allowed to find some in routine swabbing which means quantitative estimation – even more expensive esp. if low levels?).

Maybe it’s time we invented a word (Valification? since the VA bit comes first) to combine the 2Vs and then specify the operational requirements to comply at various stages of manufacturing. One could write a book on the conversations which have taken place over the distinctions involved between VA / VE.

Rgds / Charles.C

added - sorry my lack of observation, see you are making soups etc, maybe soups fpr babies ??


Edited by Charles.C, 29 January 2007 - 09:03 AM.

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Jenny

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 40 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 29 January 2007 - 10:57 PM

Dear Charles:

Thank you for your comments. The products were RTE frozen food for school meal program. The reason why the USDA inspectors asked us to conduct validation study because we didn't have any scientific reserach to support on our justification. According to their new revised directive on List. Mono. last year, they required each establishment who produces RTE frozen food companies conduct List. Mono. environmental program at least every 3 months. The question he asked was why don't we do swab every 2 months, why we choose with the least requirement (3 months). Even on our history data record showed negative results on L. Mono when we do swab in quarterly. So we have to conduct our validation study to support our justification and as supportive data. Lately in US (esp. in 2007), USDA is very strict with RTE frozen food with chicken contained product.

Oh, this situation was happened last year when I was working at the previous company who produces RTE frozen foods.

Best regards,
Jenny



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,826 posts
  • 1363 thanks
880
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 30 January 2007 - 10:13 PM

:thumbup:

Hello to all,

A simple way of putting it would be:

A food item for example can be verified

A bomb can only be validated and not verified

Hope this helps

Sankara you must be wrong; your explanation is way to simple, even I can understand the difference between verification and validation. :happydance:

Excellent. :clap:

Regards,
Simon

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Charles Chew

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,178 posts
  • 54 thanks
15
Good

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Food, food and food!

Posted 31 January 2007 - 02:16 AM

A food item for example can be verified

A bomb can only be validated and not verified

Trouble is there might not be enough time to verify its a bomb after it had been validated as one :whistle:

Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com

YongYM

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 231 posts
  • 57 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Reading, Watching TV, Singing Karaoke & Sight-seeing

Posted 05 February 2007 - 05:30 AM

Dear all:

I have conducted validation & re-validation for a few times in my company but I am not so sure whether what I did was adequate. So, I would like to know whether there is any recommended 'format' to document the validation process for improvement?

Thank you..



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,826 posts
  • 1363 thanks
880
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 06 February 2007 - 09:32 PM

Dear all:

I have conducted validation & re-validation for a few times in my company but I am not so sure whether what I did was adequate. So, I would like to know whether there is any recommended 'format' to document the validation process for improvement?

Thank you..

YongYM it may be better if you attach or at least tell the forum what you did. I know there are ISO 22000 certification body auditors here who I'm sure would be more than happy to give you some constructive feedback.

Regards,
Simon

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


YongYM

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 231 posts
  • 57 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Reading, Watching TV, Singing Karaoke & Sight-seeing

Posted 07 February 2007 - 06:41 AM

Dear Simon:



We use form to document the changes.



Sample:

DESCRIPTION Of CHANGES

Date: xxx

Time: xxx

Department: xxx

Type of changes: Installation of new wrapping machine model ABC



IMPLICATION ON FOOD SAFETY

Foreign matter e.g. metal fragment may be introduced during wrapping process.



VALIDATION METHOD

Observe cases of customer complaints regarding the presence of metal fragment within 3 months time after the installation



RESULT

No customer complaint regarding the presence of metal fragment within 3 months time after the installation was received.



AMENDMENT TO THE HACCP PLAN NEEDED

No.



Validated by: HACCP Team Date: xxx





Please comment. Thank you. :helpplease:

Edited by Simon, 07 February 2007 - 10:01 AM.


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 07 February 2007 - 09:49 AM

Dear YongYM,

Maybe I'm old-fashioned but I would have thought that an approved evaluation by QA or QA/Engg /Prod would be a necessary part of such a validation.

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


YongYM

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 231 posts
  • 57 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Reading, Watching TV, Singing Karaoke & Sight-seeing

Posted 08 February 2007 - 09:45 AM

Dear Charles:

For your information, the validation was actually done by the team members (QA, Packing personnel & Engineering personnel) and the form was signed by them.

Overall, can this type of format be accepted? Any other things that we still lack of?

Really appreacite you valuable advice. Thank you.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 10 February 2007 - 03:52 PM

Dear YongYM,

It's probably my poor understanding of yr form but I interpreted it as implying the total validation was based on getting no customer's complaints whereas my post was only intended to ask (but poorly written -sorry) whether some basic safety validation was made at time of installation (eg not being placed under an air conditioner from which occasional water drops ocurred [has happened!]).
Maybe that was the meaning of yr last post in which case sorry again and I think yr procedure is useful. Some factories also issue a kind of running chronological addendum(s) to the previous routine yearly review of the HACCP system to allow for continuous updating in case of subsequent overlooking of such changes (auditors are quite alert at spotting obviously new equipment in my experience and requesting such evaluations!).

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users