Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

11.3.9 Sanitary Facilities - Unclear on drainage

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic
- - - - -

idealdreams

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 65 posts
  • 13 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 22 January 2016 - 06:10 PM

I'm working on implementing the requirements set forth by SQF 11.3.9 but I am unclear on 11.3.9.2 where it says that

 

"Sanitary drainage shall not be connected to any other drains within the premises and shall be directed to a septic tank or a sewerage system."

 

What exactly does this mean? I'm interpreting it as the drains from toilets shouldn't share or be connected to a drain from, say, a sink in a different part of the facility (i.e. our kitchen area). Is this correct?

 

Thanks!



Bryan123

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 16 posts
  • 6 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 23 January 2016 - 03:25 PM

That would be my understanding.  If your sanitary drains backup, where would the flow go...? onto the production floor, or into the kitchen... that wouldn't be good.



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,223 posts
  • 1288 thanks
608
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 24 January 2016 - 07:14 AM

That is correct. SQF Code Guidance:
Sanitary drainage must be kept separate from drainage from food production areas.
Sanitary drainage is separated from processing facility drains.

 

Regards,

 

Tony



idealdreams

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 65 posts
  • 13 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 25 January 2016 - 06:44 PM

Thanks everyone. It seems at this point that our drainage is not separated within the building, what does this mean for us at this point? Is this something we'd fail an audit for or simply a minor/major/serious non-conformance? How do they verify that our drainage is separated or not short from our answers to them?

 

This is an expensive "fix" so at this point I think we'll take the hit on our audit before we dig up the floors of our facility and separate the drains, provided that hit isn't an immediate failure. Thoughts?



Mike Mahon

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 January 2016 - 05:31 PM

I too am interested in what level non-conformance and auditor would give on this.  



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,223 posts
  • 1288 thanks
608
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 27 January 2016 - 06:29 PM

I think it would depend on two things:

 

1. What procedures you have in place should there be a problem with the drains and that you monitor to show that there is no contamination risk from the drains in normal operation.

 

2. The product risk, if you have a high risk product such as RTE perishable products such as sandwiches then I would say it is a major non-conformity if there is no evidence of risk of product contamination otherwise critical. For low risk products a minor non-conformity.

 

Regards,

 

Tony



Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 January 2016 - 06:59 PM

Hi idealdreams,

 

I would hope your employees are good runners in the event of  a worst case scenario.

 

Seriously, this is surely a basic No-No.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

RMAV

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 407 posts
  • 122 thanks
44
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA - Midwest
  • Interests:QA, Micro, Sanitation;
    Meats, Juice, Condiments;
    SQF, Audit, and aviation

Posted 27 January 2016 - 07:23 PM

I think it may have to do with what kind (and risk) of process you have, and how close to the drains are to the process.  I would take a hard look at the process and proximity to those drains.  I would:

-ensure the drains have good traps and backflow prevention as possible

-step up environmental micro sampling of air, equipment, walls, and floors (and cooling units if applicable);

-have a plumbing provider trained in food operations on "retainer" that is, they show up within xx minutes of your call in an emergency.

-have emergency plans to deal with a backup of the drains;

-serious and robust drain cleaning program and separate tools for that use, including cleaning of the tools used

-staff training on the subject and what to do if the drains were to be an issue

-daily monitoring of the drains to ensure they are draining properly

 

The trouble with sewer drains is it's not if they contain pathogens but which ones and how many and can they get out and contaminate your plant.



Thanked by 1 Member:

RMAV

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 407 posts
  • 122 thanks
44
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA - Midwest
  • Interests:QA, Micro, Sanitation;
    Meats, Juice, Condiments;
    SQF, Audit, and aviation

Posted 27 January 2016 - 07:26 PM

Tony and Charles beat me to it.  I agree with them.



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1135 thanks
1,126
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 29 January 2016 - 02:39 AM

Start digging.

As a former SQF Auditor I would ask for the plumbing schematics.

Might be a major, but could very likely be a critical.

Regardless, you really can't afford this on an audit.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


Thanked by 1 Member:

idealdreams

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 65 posts
  • 13 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 29 January 2016 - 07:05 PM

Start digging.

As a former SQF Auditor I would ask for the plumbing schematics.

Might be a major, but could very likely be a critical.

Regardless, you really can't afford this on an audit.

 

Thanks for the advice. Do you believe there would be ways around a non-conformance through validation and monitoring activities to show the drains are fine the way they are? Or if we did nothing about this and were audited, we have no plumbing schematics. What other methods are there to show an auditor the way our plumbing is set up?



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 29 January 2016 - 08:30 PM

Thanks for the advice. Do you believe there would be ways around a non-conformance through validation and monitoring activities to show the drains are fine the way they are? Or if we did nothing about this and were audited, we have no plumbing schematics. What other methods are there to show an auditor the way our plumbing is set up?

 

Hi idealdreams,

 

I suggest you get a new plumber asap. Somebody has screwed up.

 

And hope for a long dry spell.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users