Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Universal Food Safety System for the World

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic
- - - - -

safefood007

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 6 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 26 May 2016 - 01:20 PM

Why not all the worldwide food safety systems combine and make a one universal food safety system? After that no BRC, HACCP, FSSC 22000, SQF etc. Now a days world is global village then why this global village has too much food safety systems?



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,831 posts
  • 1363 thanks
881
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 26 May 2016 - 02:03 PM

GFSI are attempting to create equivalence amongst 3rd party food safety certification standards.  It s long road and a big job.


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Thanked by 1 Member:

safefood007

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 6 thanks
2
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 28 May 2016 - 02:18 PM

best wishes for future.



Leila Burin

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 154 posts
  • 45 thanks
20
Excellent

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 03 June 2016 - 12:53 PM

On my opinion, very far away from real world.

People from Germany (IFS) wont´t ever think as people from UK (BRC).

Sorry....

Leila



Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 03 June 2016 - 01:59 PM

On my opinion, very far away from real world.

People from Germany (IFS) wont´t ever think as people from UK (BRC).

Sorry....

Leila

 

Hi Leila,

 

KO versus Due Diligence ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Leila Burin

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 154 posts
  • 45 thanks
20
Excellent

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 03 June 2016 - 05:30 PM

Hello Charles,

No. KO vs Fundamental is ok,

My point of view is how is the structure of both standards: BRC is a bullet point of compliance, IFS is more open - and retail service perspective

Leila



Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 03 June 2016 - 05:36 PM

Hello Charles,

No. KO vs Fundamental is ok,

My point of view is how is the structure of both standards: BRC is a bullet point of compliance, IFS is more open - and retail service perspective

Leila

Hi Leila,

 

I believe you.

 

I tried to read the IFS standard once and gave up with my head spinning. i always thought BRC was confusing but ........


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Leila Burin

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 154 posts
  • 45 thanks
20
Excellent

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 03 June 2016 - 05:46 PM

But pls do not take me wrong.....I was teach in the 2000, when all was HACCP or not HACCP.

And now, I see that what matters is the validation of control measures.....the trully understanding of the significant hazards and how to manage them

 

Have a nice weekend!

Leila



Thanked by 1 Member:

Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 441 posts
  • 209 thanks
107
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heel of the Boot
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted 03 June 2016 - 08:04 PM

Why not all the worldwide food safety systems combine and make a one universal food safety system? After that no BRC, HACCP, FSSC 22000, SQF etc. Now a days world is global village then why this global village has too much food safety systems?

 

Monopolizing any system is not a great idea. One, there are far too many political, socioeconomic, and cultural boundaries to negotiate with that in mind. Two, there is entirely too much money involved with certification. 


Food Safety News  Marine Stewardship Council

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


Thanked by 1 Member:

redfox

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 481 posts
  • 163 thanks
24
Excellent

  • Philippines
    Philippines

Posted 04 June 2016 - 09:51 AM

Hello Slab,

 

Very agreeable...certification is too costly. It is almost always a market-driven.

 

regards,

redfox



Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users