Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Detection of hair inside empty or filled bottles of mayo?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

Mohamed Ibrahim

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 12 January 2017 - 11:57 AM

Dear All,

 

Mayo Manufacturing company always getting complaints that closed cap mayo contains hair, is there any solution for detection of hair inside empty or filled bottles? ,

 

I know that preventive measure " Personal hygiene " should be in place, any other solutions,

 

 

Thanks,

 

Omar



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 12 January 2017 - 01:31 PM

Hi Omar,

 

The typical procedure for testing for hairs in food involves a "Filth Test " lab. procedure, eg

 

https://www2.neotron...lth_test/?l=ENG

 

Operationally, i suggest an audit. Seeing is believing.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Mohamed Ibrahim

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 12 January 2017 - 01:49 PM

Thanks, Charles,

 

Do you know anything about antistatic hair removal in the food industry? 



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 12 January 2017 - 02:39 PM

Thanks, Charles,

 

Do you know anything about antistatic hair removal in the food industry? 

 

Hi Omar,

 

My knowledge is limited to this thread -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...air-complaints/


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,496 posts
  • 1514 thanks
1,556
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 January 2017 - 02:39 PM

Do you have preventative measures in place?  Your wording in your first post reads as if you don't.....it is much easier and more cost efficient to remove the hazard than try to remove the foreign body after the fact, and that you said you ALWAYS get complaints about this means you have a GMP issue


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,545
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 12 January 2017 - 02:49 PM

Do you have preventative measures in place?  Your wording in your first post reads as if you don't.....it is much easier and more cost efficient to remove the hazard than try to remove the foreign body after the fact, and that you said you ALWAYS get complaints about this means you have a GMP issue

 

Totally agree. IMEX the causes have ranged from deficiencies due raw materials, pests, brooms, personal hygiene.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Mohamed Ibrahim

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 26 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 12 January 2017 - 03:01 PM

Thanks all , yes i have preventive measure , but this issue always happen,
If any one knows about supplier of antistatic hair removal as a control , appreciate to recommend.



Foodworker

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 353 posts
  • 234 thanks
32
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 02 February 2017 - 03:39 PM

I have never come across any anti-static hair removal devices and I would not be confident of their efficacy anyway.

 

A couple of thoughts.

 

First, are you sure it is hair. With jar closure manufacture it is possible to get something called 'angel hair' which are fine threads of the sealing compound. Rare, but can happen.

 

The second relates to your preventative measures. More than the hair covering aspect, do you have any jar rinsers or blowers over the closure feed? 





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users