Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Can there be oPRPs after process steps identified as CCPs?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

rams

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 07 August 2017 - 06:12 AM

Can there be oPRPs after the process steps which have been identified as CCPs. For example after pasteurisaton (which is a CCP), whether the subsequent steps like filing, packing, storage be treated as oPRPs?



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 07 August 2017 - 08:07 AM

Can there be oPRPs after the process steps which have been identified as CCPs. For example after pasteurisaton (which is a CCP), whether the subsequent steps like filing, packing, storage be treated as oPRPs?

 

As per the stepwise iso22000 procedure, the conclusion typically depends on whether any process step is -

 

(a) associated with a significant BCPA hazard ?

(b) if answer to (a) is yes, then the decision as to whether an oprp or a CCP exists is determined by applying 7.4.4 (a-g) and using appropriate differentiation criteria.

 

So, in principle, the answer to yr OP is maybe.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

rams

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 07 August 2017 - 12:04 PM

Thank you for your info



frawat

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 19 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Peru
    Peru
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peru
  • Interests:Quality Management
    Food Safety
    Statistical Thinking
    Six Sigma

Posted 13 August 2017 - 01:14 AM

Yes, also because the hazards at the subsequent steps could be different from the hazard at the CCP. Example pasteurization with re-contamination during packing. 

Kind regards,

Francis





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users