Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

BRC (Trace & Batch records) during audit

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Doug2018

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 21 November 2018 - 10:04 AM

Hi guys

 

We are  a indian food manufacturing company and are due our first BRC audit in december next month and are preparing for the traceability/ Recall challenge that will be presented during the audit in which we are given 4 hours to recall a product. 

 

my QUESTION IS? 

 

- How long back does the auditor go to ask for a Mass balance/ Trace on the products. we have records for 3 months and are not sure if we require any batch records or anything else after this? 

 

in your guys experience how far back did the auditor go back to ask for a traceability/ Mass balance during your BRC audit?

 

thank you and i would love any answers you guys give in order to help us in this hurdle! thanks so much



pHruit

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,072 posts
  • 849 thanks
537
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 21 November 2018 - 10:45 AM

IME it's typically been a batch produced within the last 3-6 months, but it may depend on shelf life - they'll want something that has been sold on to your customers so that you can also do a forwards element to the trace.

It's a while since I've been through a "first" BRC audit but again experience was that you can talk through with the auditor about how long your systems have been established as they want to see if these work. If it's a new site that's only been operating for three months then of course that also sets a fairly legitimate constraint!

 

If you physically don't have records prior to three months previously then they may ask questions about this - even without BRC in place you'd be expected to retain these for a sufficient period of time.



Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,506 posts
  • 1514 thanks
1,558
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 21 November 2018 - 05:02 PM

i think it's wise to have at least 1 full year of documentation available---unless of course you'e only been manufacturing for 4 months!

 

2-3 years is a normal span of time to keep records on hand


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


bensmith007

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 10 thanks
6
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 21 November 2018 - 06:07 PM

Hi Doug,

 

In our audit a couple of weeks ago the auditor chose something we manufactured in February of this year so about 9 months ago.

 

If you only have records for 3 months, make sure you also consider clause 3.4.1- the internal audit program where you need to show evidence of auditing your BRC program over the preceding 12 months- don't think that this dosen't apply if it is your first BRC audit; we did that last year and got a major non-conformance as a result, and the argument that we had nothing to audit as we weren't BRC accredited didn't wash.

 

Good luck with your audit!

 

Ben



Gerard H.

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 411 posts
  • 131 thanks
44
Excellent

  • France
    France
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 November 2018 - 08:19 AM

Dear Doug,

 

In addition to the above, please note, that batch traceability is a also a legal requirement. This file needs to be in order to avoid problems.

 

Unless other customer requirements, you need to keep the records, and to be able to retrieve them, during the shelf life of the product + 12 months.

 

Kind regards,

 

Gerard Heerkens





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users