Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Acceptable level of total coliforms for ready-to-eat grains?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

AlwaysImprove

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 02 May 2019 - 12:29 AM

What is considered to be an acceptable level of total coliforms for ready-to-eat grains? Obviously the ideal level is zero, but at what point do total coliforms become a health hazard? This is assuming e.coli is NOT present. Seems like the spec requirements vary greatly depending on the manufacturer. 

 

Thank you in advance. 



AlwaysImprove

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 02 May 2019 - 01:48 AM

What is considered to be an acceptable level of total coliforms for ready-to-eat grains? Obviously the ideal level is zero, but at what point do total coliforms become a health hazard? This is assuming e.coli is NOT present. Seems like the spec requirements vary greatly depending on the manufacturer. 

 

Thank you in advance. 

 

Would also like to clarify that when I say ready-to-eat, I'm referring to grains that are not intended to be cooked before consuming. 



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 02 May 2019 - 08:22 AM

What is considered to be an acceptable level of total coliforms for ready-to-eat grains? Obviously the ideal level is zero, but at what point do total coliforms become a health hazard? This is assuming e.coli is NOT present. Seems like the spec requirements vary greatly depending on the manufacturer. 

 

Thank you in advance. 

 

Hi AI,

 

I presume you are referring to the processed/finished product.

 

"Coliform" is a (variable) group of bacteria. It's level in a finished product is sometimes regarded as an indicator for the hygienic "quality" of the product's process environment.

 

Coliform is not regarded as a direct health hazard in the haccp "sense", ie not a pathogen.

 

(generic) E.coli has a similar interpretation to above but is a species.

 

So there is no meaningful answer to yr health query.

 

In the general/sanitary micro. quality sense, a spec. like m=10, M=100 cfu/gram is IMEX typical but this may vary depending on the microbial profile of the raw material, etc.

 

Just as an example of subjectivity, IIRC, the EU's generic E.coli limit for fresh produce is 1000cfu/gram with respect to RTE product/processes.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

AlwaysImprove

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 4 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 02 May 2019 - 03:09 PM

Hi AI,

 

I presume you are referring to the processed/finished product.

 

"Coliform" is a (variable) group of bacteria. It's level in a finished product is sometimes regarded as an indicator for the hygienic "quality" of the product's process environment.

 

Coliform is not regarded as a direct health hazard in the haccp "sense", ie not a pathogen.

 

(generic) E.coli has a similar interpretation to above but is a species.

 

So there is no meaningful answer to yr health query.

 

In the general/sanitary micro. quality sense, a spec. like m=10, M=100 cfu/gram is IMEX typical but this may vary depending on the microbial profile of the raw material, etc.

 

Just as an example of subjectivity, IIRC, the EU's generic E.coli limit for fresh produce is 1000cfu/gram with respect to RTE product/processes.

 

Thank you, that is helpful. Very surprised to see how high EU's generic e.coli limit is for produce! 

 

Typically we set total coliform limits for finished products at <10 or <100 cfu/g (with e.coli being negative). However, we are in the process of creating specs for finished products that contain trace amounts of raw flour. Since flour is often higher in total coliforms, we are having a hard time setting a threshold. Our research indicates that <1,000 cfu/g would be acceptable, but that also seems high to us since we are used to much lower results. 





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users