Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Is root cause analysis required for metal detector rejected product?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

AngieGH

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 21 posts
  • 2 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Ghana
    Ghana

Posted 12 June 2019 - 12:00 PM

Dear Fam.,

The normal functioning of a metal detector is to detect and reject non-conforming products with metals based on the critical limits set.

Will there still be a need to undergo Root cause analysis , Corrections and Corrective actions for any rejected product?

 

Thanks.

Angie.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 19,959 posts
  • 5509 thanks
1,430
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 12 June 2019 - 12:30 PM

Dear Fam.,

The normal functioning of a metal detector is to detect and reject non-conforming products with metals based on the critical limits set.

Will there still be a need to undergo Root cause analysis , Corrections and Corrective actions for any rejected product?

 

Thanks.

Angie.

 

FS Standard = ?


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


The Food Scientist

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,047 posts
  • 264 thanks
204
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Food Science, Nature, SQF, Learning, Trying out new foods, Sarcasm.

Posted 12 June 2019 - 12:35 PM

Non-conforming product requires a root cause analysis, to understand the root cause to prevent from happening again. 


Everything in food is science. The only subjective part is when you eat it. - Alton Brown.


AngieGH

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 21 posts
  • 2 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Ghana
    Ghana

Posted 12 June 2019 - 12:51 PM

FS Standard = ?

FSSC 22000



will.merrill

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 42 posts
  • 13 thanks
5
Neutral

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wish I was in Alaska

Posted 12 June 2019 - 01:08 PM

If you want to fix the problem, you’ll need to understand it...



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 19,959 posts
  • 5509 thanks
1,430
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 12 June 2019 - 01:20 PM

Dear Fam.,

The normal functioning of a metal detector is to detect and reject non-conforming products with metals based on the critical limits set.

Will there still be a need to undergo Root cause analysis , Corrections and Corrective actions for any rejected product?

 

Thanks.

Angie.

 

from iso22000 (2018) -

 

3.10
corrective action
action to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity (3.28) and to prevent recurrence
Note 1 to entry: There can be more than one cause for a nonconformity.
Note 2 to entry: Corrective action includes cause analysis.

 

 

I assume "cause analysis" = RCA


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,704 posts
  • 1298 thanks
1,092
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 June 2019 - 02:07 PM

I need to state something here, this MUST be part of your CCP validations..................the metal detector is DESIGNED to find metal, you should already have procedures as per your CCP about what to do when the metal detector rejects product. You should also EXPECT this to happen (or you wouldn't have one) 


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


AngieGH

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 21 posts
  • 2 thanks
5
Neutral

  • Ghana
    Ghana

Posted 12 June 2019 - 02:25 PM

I need to state something here, this MUST be part of your CCP validations..................the metal detector is DESIGNED to find metal, you should already have procedures as per your CCP about what to do when the metal detector rejects product. You should also EXPECT this to happen (or you wouldn't have one) 

yes.

i do agree but finding a metal in a product makes it non conforming so does  must warrant a  corrective action right?



Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,704 posts
  • 1298 thanks
1,092
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 June 2019 - 04:26 PM

You should have deviation and corrective action procedures written into your CCP already, that's my point............yes of course you need to do something, but you shouldn't have to think about it.............just follow the deviation and corrective action procedures as written in your plan


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


majoy

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 243 posts
  • 91 thanks
62
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female

Posted 12 June 2019 - 04:28 PM

to come up with a corrective action (defined as to prevent recurrence), a root cause analysis must be carried out.

 

A product being non-conforming and consequently being destroyed/reworked etc. should not be a reason why you will no longer carry out root cause analysis. If the product keeps being rejected by metal detector, then there must be something causing metal contamination.


"Whatever you do, do it well..." - Walt Disney


Ryan M.

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,300 posts
  • 470 thanks
278
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham, AL
  • Interests:Reading, crosswords, passionate discussions, laughing at US politics.

Posted 13 June 2019 - 01:51 AM

Unless...your metal detector caused the rejection with something falling off into your product stream.  :spoton:





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users