Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

3PL Storage- Cleaning Effectiveness


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Taralynn

Taralynn

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:50 PM

Hello, 

 

I am in the process of developing and implementing  SQF Storage & Distribution, we are a third party cold storage company. We never have exposed meat product (vegetables at times cross dock), we may at times repack primary packaged products into new secondary packaging for customers and/or relabel primary packaging. 

 

The master sanitation schedule reflects cleaning tasks to what we do, my question is how do I ensure the effectiveness of the cleaning?  Would ATP swabs be the best approach? For allergen spills would Protein ATP swabs be the route? 

 

Due to the infrequency of spills and relabeling or re-boxing, the ATP swabs tend to expire before we go through them. (which is costly) 

 

Is a visual inspection adequate in these cases? 

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated. 



#2 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,417 posts
  • 868 thanks
737
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA

Posted 30 July 2019 - 09:41 PM

You can use a just-in-time delivery for ATP swabs from a national or local lab, visual inspections may be ok short term, but will not fly well at audit time.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC Group | +1.800.793.7042 | Serving the Food, Food Packaging & Food Storage Industries
SQF Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants 
 
In a nutshell we help small to large businesses to get their act together (as needed), help them to co-develop
entire SQF documentation systems, make recommendations as to installations and repairs in order
to get certified and continue with on-going support thru our popular eConsultant program and we do
all in about 30 days so your staff can implement with our assistance to retain and get new business!
 
Serving the new Republic of the United States of America & Alliance Countries

http://www.GlennOster.com


#3 Fred73

Fred73

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 69 posts
  • 20 thanks
10
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ/NY

Posted 14 August 2019 - 01:01 PM

Visual inspection verification is enough for S&D, you do not need to do any test, additionally you can conduct a risk assessment and list all possibles contamination's and how you will address it all trough your sanitation plan and proper handling of product (describe how you will handle the product to prevent cross contamination, your GDP's, etc). SQF S&D shows a big difference from "Manufacturing" in this specific point. This has worked very well for us in several audits.



Thanked by 1 Member:

#4 agasr

agasr

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 37 posts
  • 9 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 August 2019 - 11:19 PM

I would concur with Fred73. For S&D with no exposed products and repack of finished goods only - visual observations/confirmations should be sufficient.

 

In fact If I am  correct, the Environmental Monitoring is N/A for S&D in SQF 8.0. Hope this helps further to what Fred73 shared. Regards, 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users