Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

3PL Storage- Cleaning Effectiveness


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Taralynn

Taralynn

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 8 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:50 PM

Hello, 

 

I am in the process of developing and implementing  SQF Storage & Distribution, we are a third party cold storage company. We never have exposed meat product (vegetables at times cross dock), we may at times repack primary packaged products into new secondary packaging for customers and/or relabel primary packaging. 

 

The master sanitation schedule reflects cleaning tasks to what we do, my question is how do I ensure the effectiveness of the cleaning?  Would ATP swabs be the best approach? For allergen spills would Protein ATP swabs be the route? 

 

Due to the infrequency of spills and relabeling or re-boxing, the ATP swabs tend to expire before we go through them. (which is costly) 

 

Is a visual inspection adequate in these cases? 

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated. 



#2 SQFconsultant

SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,087 posts
  • 787 thanks
652
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Truth is like a delicious slice of watermelon... you just want more and more!

Posted 30 July 2019 - 09:41 PM

You can use a just-in-time delivery for ATP swabs from a national or local lab, visual inspections may be ok short term, but will not fly well at audit time.


Kind regards,

 

Glenn Oster
 
GOC GROUP / +1.800.793.7042 / Food - Food Packaging - Food Storage/DC

SQF, BRC & IFS System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants

Serving Small-to-Mid-Size Businesses | Now accepting: BTC, XRP, ETH, DAI, USDCoin

Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant | SQF, BRC & IFS Pre-Development or Pre-Audit GAP

http://www.GlennOsterConsulting.com  -- 

 

 

Please consider making a donation to Oster Missions. We are collecting monies to 

assist a recently widowed American citizen residing in Panama who just lost her husband.

Please see the GOC NEWS SECTION of our main page for Card and Crypto-Donations

Oster Missions is a 501c3 US Registered Charity Organization.

http://www.glennosterconsulting.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

#3 Fred73

Fred73

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 56 posts
  • 17 thanks
6
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 14 August 2019 - 01:01 PM

Visual inspection verification is enough for S&D, you do not need to do any test, additionally you can conduct a risk assessment and list all possibles contamination's and how you will address it all trough your sanitation plan and proper handling of product (describe how you will handle the product to prevent cross contamination, your GDP's, etc). SQF S&D shows a big difference from "Manufacturing" in this specific point. This has worked very well for us in several audits.



Thanked by 1 Member:

#4 agasr

agasr

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 37 posts
  • 9 thanks
2
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 August 2019 - 11:19 PM

I would concur with Fred73. For S&D with no exposed products and repack of finished goods only - visual observations/confirmations should be sufficient.

 

In fact If I am  correct, the Environmental Monitoring is N/A for S&D in SQF 8.0. Hope this helps further to what Fred73 shared. Regards, 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

EV SSL Certificate