Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Gap analysis of SQF 8 and CFR 111

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic
- - - - -

Plastic Ducky

    Director of Food Safety

  • IFSQN Member
  • 175 posts
  • 42 thanks
41
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Provo, Utah
  • Interests:FDA, USDA, SQF, BRC, FSMA, FSM (Flying Spaghetti Monsterism), Acidified Foods, LAFC, using a spotlight to hunt C.H.U.D.s at night, cooking, mycology, the middle path, epistemology, waffles, and being an all around student

Posted 08 August 2019 - 08:35 PM

Hello all!!!!

 

I wanted to see if anyone would be willing to share a gap analysis between SQF Food Safety and CFR 111. I have seen these comparisons floating around before. The intent being to identity any request more astringent in CFR 111 would be applied across the board for all productions. We are a co-manufacturer so that is a reality.

 

Anyone?

 

Thank you all!!!!

 

 

PD



Plastic Ducky

    Director of Food Safety

  • IFSQN Member
  • 175 posts
  • 42 thanks
41
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Provo, Utah
  • Interests:FDA, USDA, SQF, BRC, FSMA, FSM (Flying Spaghetti Monsterism), Acidified Foods, LAFC, using a spotlight to hunt C.H.U.D.s at night, cooking, mycology, the middle path, epistemology, waffles, and being an all around student

Posted 09 August 2019 - 08:37 PM

Hold on now, not everyone at once......

 

But seriously, I got on Scribd and found a template for cGMP audit of CFR 21 Part 110 and 111 and I plan on making the gap analysis tool myself in-case anyone is interested....

 

PD





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users