Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Does covering staples in documents with heavy tape meet the requirements of BRC 4.9.2.2?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic
- - - - -

kurmy

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 11 posts
  • 4 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 01 June 2020 - 12:55 AM

We have quite a large number of documents used in our processing area. Currently we staple them together and cover the staple with a piece of heavy-duty tape to prevent the staple from ever coming out and contaminating the product. This process is done everyday with new production sheets and new staple and new tape.
My question have we reduced the risk to an acceptable level and does this meet the requirement of BRC 4.9.2.2. as the intent of staples becoming a source of contamination is prevented.



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,224 posts
  • 1292 thanks
610
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 01 June 2020 - 05:08 AM

Hi kurmy,

 

The Standard clearly states in clause 4.9.2.2: Staples, paper clips and drawing pins shall not be used in open product areas.

 

‘SHALL’ VERSUS ‘MAY’

The style of the Standard is generally one of guidance, to allow companies to ensure that all aspects of control have been considered, so that thorough and comprehensive policies and procedures may be developed. In some instances, the Standard requires that criteria must be included within a policy or procedure, and this is generally covered by the term ‘shall’. If any of the points included are not covered adequately, a non-conformity will result.

However, there are also a number of clauses that provide examples or guidelines, generally preceded by the words ‘may include’ or ‘should’. This information is provided as guidance for incorporation in company policies and procedures. It is the responsibility of the company to ensure that the auditor is satisfied that the system in place is appropriate.

 

You may have reduced the risk, or you may have introduced another risk – the tape. Whichever, both will be scrutinised during an audit.

 

So, my first question, is this an open product area? if so the practice would be of concern. If not your practice may be acceptable.

 

Would it not be easier just to hold these in a plastic folder?

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony



kurmy

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 11 posts
  • 4 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 01 June 2020 - 06:59 AM

Hi Tony many thanks for your response.
Yes this is an open product area. A meat boning /processing room.
There's quite a lot of sheets per day. Approximately 20 to 30 in the bundle. It is convenient for the 10+ QA and area managers to have them folded up in their pockets.
We are looking at alternatives ie iPads /tablets or terminals to hold this information but as this is an expensive option I thought I would ask the question. Any advice on alternatives would be greatly appreciated.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5664 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 01 June 2020 - 07:20 AM

Hi Tony many thanks for your response.
Yes this is an open product area. A meat boning /processing room.
There's quite a lot of sheets per day. Approximately 20 to 30 in the bundle. It is convenient for the 10+ QA and area managers to have them folded up in their pockets.
We are looking at alternatives ie iPads /tablets or terminals to hold this information but as this is an expensive option I thought I would ask the question. Any advice on alternatives would be greatly appreciated.

^^^^^ Just an additional comment - IIRC, pockets are also preferably absent

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...ets/#entry46468


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


kurmy

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 11 posts
  • 4 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 01 June 2020 - 07:52 AM

Agreed no "external" pockets in use. Also no high risk.



pHruit

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,072 posts
  • 849 thanks
537
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 01 June 2020 - 08:08 AM

Hi Tony many thanks for your response.
Yes this is an open product area. A meat boning /processing room.
There's quite a lot of sheets per day. Approximately 20 to 30 in the bundle. It is convenient for the 10+ QA and area managers to have them folded up in their pockets.
We are looking at alternatives ie iPads /tablets or terminals to hold this information but as this is an expensive option I thought I would ask the question. Any advice on alternatives would be greatly appreciated.

Clipboards?

Can get metal ones so you're not introducing wood/plastic, keeps the paperwork together without using staples/tape/paperclips etc.
 



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5664 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 01 June 2020 - 08:38 AM

Agreed no "external" pockets in use. Also no high risk.

Based on my experience, BRC auditors will not unreservably close their eyes in low risk environments. :smile:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


kurmy

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 11 posts
  • 4 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 01 June 2020 - 09:37 AM

Thanks Charles. C, pHruit and Tony-C.
As I see it from responses
1- staples in paper work is a nonconformance regardless, as it is a "shall". Regardless of the tape.
2- Metal clipboards maybe the next best option.

Happy to hear any other thoughts.



zoelawton

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 159 posts
  • 42 thanks
31
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 01 June 2020 - 09:42 AM

We use clipboards where we have several pieces of paper. We also have a stainless steel desk where orders (countless paper documents) are om, spread out for ease etc. and the the clipboards hang on the side of the desk.



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,662 posts
  • 1139 thanks
1,132
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 01 June 2020 - 12:24 PM

We have used a stapler that does not use metal staples. It cuts the paper itself in such a way to bind the sheets together.

Works great!


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


Thanked by 1 Member:

trubertq

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 658 posts
  • 281 thanks
137
Excellent

  • Ireland
    Ireland
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Donegal

Posted 17 June 2020 - 10:13 AM

No Staples in production area ever.... got dinged for this....

 

Metal clipboards or move as much of your recording to computer workstations as you can


I'm entitled to my opinion, even a stopped clock is right twice a day

El Molino

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 62 posts
  • 10 thanks
6
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 18 June 2020 - 08:13 PM

I can add another : storage clipboard - closed system with the papers stored inside with a clip - closes with a plastic snap - no metal - staples or wood looks like a book



kurmy

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 11 posts
  • 4 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 19 June 2020 - 08:11 AM

Many thanks for the ideas. Glad I asked.:)



GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,849 posts
  • 726 thanks
236
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 24 June 2020 - 10:29 AM

Just get rid of the staples.  The knots you will tie yourself in to try and get this accepted aren't worth the pain!



BerBN

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 9 posts
  • 3 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Ireland
    Ireland

Posted 06 July 2020 - 10:26 AM

I have been using the stapleless staples for all documentation that is in the open product area for over 2 yrs now. No issues with same.

I have them numbered and recorded as high risk items, (as can only get plastic), checked daily at start-up before production begins. (any damaged are recorded, removed and replaced) 





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users