Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

SQF Edition 9 - Draft for Public Comment

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

nwine

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 20 posts
  • 4 thanks
7
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth

Posted 01 July 2020 - 05:24 PM

Howdy folks! Now that we're all good and comfortable with 8.1, SQFI has opened their draft of Edition 9 for public comment. Take a peak below:

 

https://www.sqfi.com...t=sqf_edition_9

 

Anyone give it a read yet? I'm making my way through modules 2 and 11 and haven't seen anything too significant yet, but I'm curious to see how everyone's affected. 



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1135 thanks
1,126
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 01 July 2020 - 05:34 PM

Yes, in process of study so we are ready to help clients on changes - lots of them!  

 

Glad to see they are opening up new areas as well.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,826 posts
  • 1363 thanks
880
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 01 July 2020 - 05:56 PM

Thanks for sharing nlamers. :clap:

 

Standards are ever evolving...

 

Regards,

Simon


Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


crabcake5

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 17 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 02 July 2020 - 02:47 PM

When do they plan on switching to Edition 9? I saw in an email from SQFI that they mentioned May 2021?



Thanked by 1 Member:

SoupsNStuff

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 51 posts
  • 11 thanks
25
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 31 July 2020 - 06:50 PM

Not excited about potentially having to switch from module 11 to module 9 as a processed meat manufacturer :( 



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1135 thanks
1,126
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 31 July 2020 - 07:45 PM

pre-processed (slaughter, boning, etc.) is 9 under 8.1 - are you pre-process or process?


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1135 thanks
1,126
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 31 July 2020 - 07:59 PM

When do they plan on switching to Edition 9? I saw in an email from SQFI that they mentioned May 2021?

 

May 2021 is the planned implementation.


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


SoupsNStuff

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 51 posts
  • 11 thanks
25
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 03 August 2020 - 02:34 PM

pre-processed (slaughter, boning, etc.) is 9 under 8.1 - are you pre-process or process?

 

We are process, meat slicing so have been following Module 11. I guess it will be interesting to see how much or how little it will differ when all the changes are finalized.



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,632 posts
  • 1135 thanks
1,126
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 03 August 2020 - 02:58 PM

We are process, meat slicing so have been following Module 11. I guess it will be interesting to see how much or how little it will differ when all the changes are finalized.

 

Cool. you will still be 11 not 9.

 

I have found over the past 15 years with SQF that every time they do an update most everything on the initial exposure sticks with the exception of redundant's, typo's etc.

 

I just got finished with a meeting here this morning and we discussed at what point we are going to switch over to developing 9.0 systems from 8.1 and we are thinking in the fall right now plus we have software to change out too.

 

SQF always keeps things interesting!


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


CCSQC

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 13 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 20 April 2021 - 03:34 PM

Not excited about potentially having to switch from module 11 to module 9 as a processed meat manufacturer :(

Same here.  We're secondary processors of frozen seafood.  Looks like we're going from 11 to 9 as well.





Share this


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users