Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Canadian and US maximum permissible level of heavy metals in fish

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic
- - - - -

JFatimah

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 14 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Mauritius
    Mauritius

Posted 12 November 2020 - 06:54 AM

Hello, I am looking for the Canadian and US maximum permissible level of heavy metals in fish (lead, mercury and cadmium) but cannot find any. For Canadian I was able to find the limits for lead and mercury only. Can someone help me out? Thank you.



olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,363 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 12 November 2020 - 04:22 PM



Slab

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 438 posts
  • 208 thanks
105
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heel of the Boot
  • Interests:Reading (history, science fiction), Photography, drawing,food safety, metrology, TQM, hoplology, etc.

Posted 12 November 2020 - 04:36 PM

For US FDA and EPA action levels...

 

Attached File  Fish-Fishery-Products-Hazards-Controls-FDA-EPA-Safety-Levels-in-Regulations-and-Guidance-Appendix5-August2019 .pdf   490.43KB   18 downloads

 

 


Food Safety News  Marine Stewardship Council

 

"Some people freak out when they see small vertebra in their pasta" ~ Chef John


Thanked by 1 Member:

JFatimah

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 14 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Mauritius
    Mauritius

Posted 13 November 2020 - 09:44 AM

Hi,

 

Thanks Olenazh.

 

i used the same link and got the limits for Mercury, however there is none for lead and cadmium.

 

Maybe they have not yet established limits for these.



millerjf

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 5 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Canada
    Canada

Posted 29 June 2023 - 12:43 PM

I'm interested in exploring this topic a bit further.  We are a Canadian fish processing facility interested in getting into marketing fresh tuna and swordfish within Canada and into the US.  We have our heads wrapped around the acceptable levels in each country but are having trouble determining how to properly handle in our HACCP plan.  Are other companies dealing with this as a CCP or simply through periodic verification testing of mercury in the product?  I fear this is a pandoras box.



Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,444 posts
  • 1507 thanks
1,524
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 29 June 2023 - 01:32 PM

I would  set my tolerance to the lower level period. I would infer from below, that testing should be routine for each lot/fish (given that tuna and swordfish are huge animals one would equal a lot) or demand a CoA from your vendor

 

Some guidance

https://inspection.c...5/1671460542870

 

https://www.canada.c...ns-answers.html

Why are there two different standards for mercury in fish?

Health Canada and CFIA's scientists continue to find that the total mercury levels in the majority of commercial fish species, including canned tuna, are below the 0.5 ppm standard for total mercury in commercial fish, which was first established in 1970. However, certain varieties of piscivorous (fish-eating) fish tend to contain more than 0.5 ppm total mercury. Although these types of fish are higher in mercury they are normally consumed less frequently than other types of fish and therefore are not considered to be a significant source of mercury to the average diet. Rather than prevent the sale of these piscivorous fish, fresh/frozen tuna (not including canned tuna), shark, swordfish, escolar, marlin, and orange roughy are permitted to be sold as long as they contain less than 1.0 ppm total mercury. These fish are also subject to consumption advice.

Why does the standard cover total mercury when methylmercury is of concern?

Total mercury is the sum of all chemical forms of mercury, including methylmercury. Analyzing fish tissues for total mercury is less expensive than analyzing for the individual chemical forms of mercury, such as methylmercury. Since fish tissues are commonly analyzed for total mercury, Health Canada has developed standards based on total mercury levels. This approach is acceptable given that most of the mercury present in fish tissue is in the form of methylmercury.

What happens to fish if its mercury level exceeds the standards?

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) regularly tests fish and shellfish from fish processing plants to determine if they meet the Canadian standards for total mercury. If a fish contains higher mercury levels than what the Canadian standards permit, more testing is done on fish from the same lot or batch. Fish that are found to violate the Canadian standards for total mercury are not permitted to be sold in Canada.


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users