4 replies to this topic

[gaganreettiwana]

Should screener and sifter considered as preventive control or CCP?

[Scampi]

Both would be correct----depends on risk and what your company decides

 

What type of product are you making?

[gaganreettiwana]

Both would be correct----depends on risk and what your company decides

 

What type of product are you making?

We make bakery goods. Currently screener and sifter is CCP at our facility.

[Scampi]

I'm assuming frozen products

 

You can leave it as a CCP if you think you have enough moving parts and/or vendor issues

 

If you've got basic equipment without a lot of moving parts, then having it as a ccp may be over kill

 

What did your hazard analysis tell you?  Are there other controls in place?

[Charles.C]

Should screener and sifter considered as preventive control or CCP?

 

Canada may have a unique answer by own definition ?

 

Presumably the hazard is foreign materials ("fm").

 

"FM" could include metal.

 

A highly popular question. the typical Codex choice is between CCP and PRP.

 

To extend post 4, it depends on flowchart, history, etc

 

eg -

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...ccp/#entry23187

https://www.ifsqn.co...rp/#entry133208