Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
- - - - -

Expanding into a receiving and distribution building, do we need two audits?

cert for two buildings expanding into second build.

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

tara@primeingredients

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 13 April 2021 - 08:00 PM

We currently rent our manufacturing building but over the past months have grown that we need a distribution/receiving building. We found one in the same privately owned industrial park, with same address but different building number but it's a couple of buildings away from our current building. Under SQF, can we be audited as one facility or do I have to have two audits completed.



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,772 posts
  • 947 thanks
840
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:American Patriot
    WWG1WGA
    Never give up, never give in - always win!
    Martha's Vineyard Island, Massachusetts

Posted 13 April 2021 - 10:25 PM

Still 1 facility, 1 location, 1 certification. The added buildi will need to be in full SQF compliance just like your current facility is and both buikdings get inspected. Contact your CB to let them know what you are doing, etc as they need to make changes etc.


Kind regards,
Glenn Oster
 
GOC BUSINESS GROUP | SQF System Development, Implementation & Certification Consultants
Internal Auditor Training - eConsultant Retainer Subscriptions - Pre & Post SQF-GAP Audits - Consultant Training
Visit us @ http://www.GlennOster.com  or call us @ 772.646.4115 US-EST 8am-4pm Anyday except Thursday
 
 

Thanked by 1 Member:

tara@primeingredients

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 14 April 2021 - 12:39 PM

Thank you for the quick reply and answer I was hoping for!






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users