Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Pesticides - Subcontracted laboratory

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic
- - - - -

ElsaSD

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 16 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 08 April 2022 - 01:29 PM

Hi all,

 

We subcontract pesticides analysis to a ISO/IEC 17025 accredited laboratory.

The pesticides tests are under their scope of accreditation but just only certain performances are covered by the accreditation. What I don't understand is when using the same method, some pesticides are covered by the accreditation but others are not (as per their analysis report).

 

Anyone else had the same issue with subcontracted laboratories?

What are the implications of this? Are this analysis reports valid or not?

 

Thank you so much in advance.

 

Regards,

Elsa



olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 08 April 2022 - 01:43 PM

That's really tricky, I have that problem myself. What I know is that only those analyses are valid for which the approved methods are used (not sure, how it's in UK, but in Canada the analytical methods are to be approved by Health Canada). You may then find out which pesticides are not covered by accreditation and find another lab for those tests.



ElsaSD

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 16 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 08 April 2022 - 01:52 PM

Thank you so much Olenazh 



pHruit

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 2,072 posts
  • 849 thanks
537
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Composing/listening to classical music, electronics, mountain biking, science, sarcasm

Posted 09 April 2022 - 08:42 AM

Honestly I'd start by having a chat with the lab manager. It might be that e.g. the methods are recent additions that they haven't got round to adding to the scope yet.

The results are "valid" irrespective of UKAS/ISO17025 accreditation provided that the method used has been validated and followed correctly - I know a lot of UK retail/brand customers insist on ISO17025, but I also suspect that a lot of them blindly ask for this without fully considering the context of the analysis in question ;)



Thanked by 1 Member:

silviastar

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

Posted 17 June 2022 - 02:17 AM

Might have something to do with the lack of compatible reagents as well.



koldobrew

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 23 June 2022 - 02:09 AM

It might also have something to do with the lack of compatible reagents. For instance, whenever I have someone run similar tests for the products I buy for my cafe, I always pay attention. I insist they use high-end testing kits, something like they have at mzfoodtest.com or similar to them. I have been running my cafe for a while and have never had any issues concerning the quality controls. I always look at this because it's better to overpay for testing than lose money in fines.


Edited by koldobrew, 23 June 2022 - 02:10 AM.




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users