4 replies to this topic

[Ventura]

Good Morning
Can anyone give me the interpretation guide for the BRCGS Packaging standard version 6.

 

Thanks!

Olga Sousa

[Evans X.]

Greetings Ventura,

 

I'm sorry but it's not possible to help you on this, as it is BRCGS's intellectual property and it is protected by copyright law. You can purchase it here:

 

https://www.brcgs.co...ideline-/p-745/

 

The standard is pretty straightforward in most clauses and if you have any questions for something specific you could ask the community here.

 

Regards!

Edited by Evans X., 03 June 2022 - 12:40 PM.

[paulkenny92]

I'm not sure the interpreatation is worth getting to be honest with you.

TechniK found several inconsistencies within the interpretation that don't marry up particularly well to the standard itself. - https://techni-k.co....interpretation/

I think its better just going by what the standard said and bringing things in accordingly :)

[Charles.C]

I'm not sure the interpreatation is worth getting to be honest with you.

TechniK found several inconsistencies within the interpretation that don't marry up particularly well to the standard itself. - https://techni-k.co....interpretation/

I think its better just going by what the standard said and bringing things in accordingly :)

Hi paul,

 

Thks yr input.

 

Might add that assuming Packaging is the same as Food, the material in the BRC "interpretations" document is not auditable, per se.

[beautiophile]

Agree with Charles' comment.

Auditors have got their own interpretation while doing the audits.