Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Supplier Approval for Food Contact Containers Without COAs

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

JimGalbo

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 05 May 2026 - 04:48 PM

Hi All,

 

I am having trouble trying to approve a supplier that refuses to send us COA's with their shipments.

 

The supplier in question supplies my company with food contact containers - drums and totes. They are unable to provide us with any documentation for individual shipments on the quality/cleanliness of the containers. Instead of rejecting them and sourcing a new supplier, I was hoping for some ideas on how I could make them compliant with SQF standards.

 

My initial idea was to develop a procedure to ATP swab the containers based on the quantity we receive at a given time. I'm not sure if this would be sufficient or not for an auditor.

 

Thank you,

 

Jim


  • 0

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 6,341 posts
  • 1707 thanks
1,995
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 05 May 2026 - 05:16 PM

IMHO ATP would not be sufficient

 

Why not just clean and sanitize ALL prior to use?


  • 1

Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


TimG

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,194 posts
  • 269 thanks
566
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 05 May 2026 - 05:19 PM

Hello, I occasionally supply a certificate of conformance (CoC) for the very few jars we sell (like twice a year, very few). Some questions:

  • Do you require a COA (or CoC) with each shipment of product?
  • If so, is this due to internal risk analysis or a food safety scheme requirement?

 

Edit: A CoC is really a bare minimum if you don't want to clean these yourself. Matching the lot/qty they shipped. It's also not very hard for them to put a template together and provide it for you for each purchase..not sure why they are pushing back on it.


Edited by TimG, 05 May 2026 - 05:25 PM.

  • 0

jfrey123

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,363 posts
  • 361 thanks
628
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sparks, NV

Posted 05 May 2026 - 05:51 PM

COA's in general aren't a firm requirement of SQF, and generally approval would/should defer more to your supplier's overall food safety plan vs some individual COA per lot (unless their plan relies upon testing each lot of finished product, which I've never heard of for packaging).

 

At best, you might be able to twist their arm into a CoC stating that the shipment has been checked to follow their food safety plan.  But effectively that's just a new LoG for each order and again not something they're likely to want to provide.


  • 0

liberator

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 128 posts
  • 45 thanks
24
Excellent

  • Australia
    Australia
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Sci-Fi - Movies/TV
    Model Kit Building
    Gardening
    Home Renovations
    Riding my Motorcycle

Posted 06 May 2026 - 03:33 AM

Do you have an agreed to specification with this supplier and does this specification include requirements about the suitability of the packaging for food contact? Including any micro requirements as well as tests that show it is a suitable packaging for the product you are packing.

 

If you have an agreed to specification, then as per above, a CoC from the supplier could work.

 

We used to have a salt supplier who wouldn't test each batch of salt for us but would always certify that the product meets the agreed to product specification. The CoC was sent each month and listed the batch lots supplied for that month.

 

I've audited many packaging suppliers, and they will only provide a CoC that states the product meets the agreed to specification between them and the customer, and that was acceptable.


  • 0

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,556 posts
  • 1013 thanks
555
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 06 May 2026 - 08:29 AM

Yep I'm in agreement with a CoC. After all a CoA requires some analysis to have taken place on that batch. Unlikely for packaging. But a CoC stating the batch meets the specification requirements including chemical residue (which wouldn't be picked up by ATP) and micro loading.

 

For food packaging being washed. That's not common. Most would invert packaging before filling and might use an air jet (obviously filtered). Water rinsing is messy, prone to blocking and not necessarily more hygienic depending on your application.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.


Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,068 posts
  • 1510 thanks
836
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 07 May 2026 - 04:24 AM

Hi Jim,

 

As per previous posts a CoC is normally acceptable with packaging deliveries with annual analysis including chemical migration.

 

In fact, the SQF Code (current Edition 9) includes reference to CoCs:

2.3.4 Approved Supplier Program (Mandatory)

2.3.4.2 The approved supplier program shall be based on the past performance of a supplier and the risk level of the raw materials, ingredients, processing aids, packaging, and services supplied, and shall contain at a minimum:

….

vi. Details of the certificates of conformance, if required; and

2.3.4.3 Verification of raw materials shall include certificates of conformance, certificates of analysis, or sampling, and testing. The verification frequency shall be identified by the site.

 

Regarding GMO’s comment regarding food packaging being washed, it is not unusual for bottles/jars to be washed/rinsed (particularly for glass packaging).

 

I would like to know the reason why you were considering ATP swabbing, perhaps you have some micro concerns?

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams Available via the recording or a live webinar on Friday 15th May 2026

Suitable for food safety (HACCP) team members as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.

 

New Edition 10 SQF Food Safety Management System Implementation Package for Food Manufacturers - Compliant with SQF Edition 9 & 10 and includes technical support until you achieve SQF certification

 

Free monthly Food Safety Essentials Webinars - Look out for our next live webinar

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations Available via the recording until the next live Webinar on Friday 5th June 2026

Suitable for Internal Auditors as per the requirements of GFSI benchmarked standards including BRCGS and SQF.

 

IFSQN Implementation Packages, helping sites achieve food safety certification since 2009: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification




Share this


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users