While filtration close to use is a good idea, there's also the argument they're using it inappropriately now. If you buy something specifically for that use, how do you know they'll use it and not the one they're already using.
Two thoughts.
Firstly, should they be using it at all? I'd argue no and not just from a food safety perspective. By blowing off the water retained on the cleaned moulds, they are putting aerosols into the atmosphere of a chocolate plant. Not a good idea at all. Secondly compressed air is really flipping dangerous. So there is a people safety aspect.
I'd spend some time with the team understanding why they're using it. Is it because they don't have long enough for the moulds to dry naturally? Do you have a spare set which can dry as the others are in use? Could you? Is it a design issue? Is excessive water being added? Could you look at your washing machine differently? Could air knives be installed within the final stage from controlled sources of compressed air in a place where any aerosols generated can be contained?
Secondly, if they do need it, why not control the whole thing? If they can use it safely from a food safety and health and safety point of view, can you make your whole compressed air system food grade? Change the oils in use, put in suitable filtration and traps etc. Or, ideally, can you do both? Get rid of the problem with drying the moulds which is being mitigated with the compressed air but also make your compressed air food safe? Because some idiot will use it for a new food contact purpose tomorrow that you've not thought of (even if it's just a one off).
Edited by GMO, 10 September 2026 - 05:01 PM.