- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More
Is one single 'global' food safety standard possible?
Started by ads78, Mar 11 2007 08:46 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 11 March 2007 - 08:46 PM
I have reviewed several standards and all have their own benefits and disadvantages. The conventional standards all seem to be competing to become the “Global” standard. The initial concept in the UK in the early 1990’s was of a unified standard. Now we have BRC, ISO, EFSIS, IFS, and several more for organic food too. It is a good thing that the industry is developing and becoming more aware of the need for quality management systems. The downside seems to be that with some companies not recognizing standards, it is restricting trade in some ways and also adding extra cost to the supply of goods. Is this a good thing or should we be striving for a truly global standard?
#2
Posted 12 March 2007 - 09:43 AM
Interesting question; in short yes it would be great to have one global food safety standard. ISO 22000 was supposed to be the unifying standard, but somehow I don’t see it. BRC / IFS / SQF / AIB et al. are too well established and importantly trusted within their respective markets. You know the saying “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” – well I think it applies here. I don’t ever see a single global food safety standard. Just my opinion.I have reviewed several standards and all have their own benefits and disadvantages. The conventional standards all seem to be competing to become the “Global” standard. The initial concept in the UK in the early 1990’s was of a unified standard. Now we have BRC, ISO, EFSIS, IFS, and several more for organic food too. It is a good thing that the industry is developing and becoming more aware of the need for quality management systems. The downside seems to be that with some companies not recognizing standards, it is restricting trade in some ways and also adding extra cost to the supply of goods. Is this a good thing or should we be striving for a truly global standard?
Regards,
Simon
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
#3
Posted 12 March 2007 - 02:47 PM
Dear ads78,
I think one significant hindrance to a global standard will be that different geographical areas do not have the same opinion as to the "best" way of controlling food safety / quality whatever. for example I believe BRC, IFS is not commonly found in US where, regulatory-wise, the FDA and affiliates seem to dominate everything (like the UK / FSA but much more so ?). Not sure if the US also utilise the "due diligence" concept ?
Rgds / Charles.C
I think one significant hindrance to a global standard will be that different geographical areas do not have the same opinion as to the "best" way of controlling food safety / quality whatever. for example I believe BRC, IFS is not commonly found in US where, regulatory-wise, the FDA and affiliates seem to dominate everything (like the UK / FSA but much more so ?). Not sure if the US also utilise the "due diligence" concept ?
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
#4
Posted 12 March 2007 - 03:04 PM
My opinion is since that the market is globalizing as a whole, the same thing is going to happen to the market of food safety / quality. I think this is a global trend. Maybe is going to be a little biti difficult but in some years from today it will be a reality.
#5
Posted 13 March 2007 - 09:38 PM
Yes maybe Vassilis, after all never is a very, very long time.My opinion is since that the market is globalizing as a whole, the same thing is going to happen to the market of food safety / quality. I think this is a global trend. Maybe is going to be a little biti difficult but in some years from today it will be a reality.
Simon
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
#6
Posted 16 March 2007 - 12:48 PM
G’day ads78,
Naturally is one unified standard possible but it is not realistic to expect one soon.
Beside the hindrance CC mentioned I also believe that enterprises will feel the need to distinct themselves from others.
One way of doing so is to create or use a typical standard for food safety management systems.
This force to be different is freedom in the very pure form, doing things differently because you believe in it and satisfying customers is what keeps us going.
Remember to share good fortune with your friends, Okido
Naturally is one unified standard possible but it is not realistic to expect one soon.
Beside the hindrance CC mentioned I also believe that enterprises will feel the need to distinct themselves from others.
One way of doing so is to create or use a typical standard for food safety management systems.
This force to be different is freedom in the very pure form, doing things differently because you believe in it and satisfying customers is what keeps us going.
Remember to share good fortune with your friends, Okido
#7
Posted 18 March 2007 - 01:37 PM
I don’t believe the British Retailers would ever willingly change to another standard for the sake of ‘going global’. After all they were the driving force behind the BRC Global Standards, they played a large part in developing their content and they have their representative industry body the British Retail Consortium administering the standards. They have their own bespoke standard and it is all very nice and neat; more importantly they are good standards and are doing their job in protecting consumers and assisting retailers with their due diligence requirements.
I believe they would change their position only if forced to by EU law. The exact same could be said about the German and French retailers position with regard to IFS.
Regards,
Simon
I believe they would change their position only if forced to by EU law. The exact same could be said about the German and French retailers position with regard to IFS.
Regards,
Simon
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









