Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

bad HACCP?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic
- - - - -

AL BUNDY

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 29 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Chile
    Chile

Posted 31 January 2008 - 01:28 PM

Hi again....
why in the cooking step everybody name "patogen survival" as a hazzard reasonably likely to occur?
One of the cooking step's objetives it's kill patogen... so why survival it's likely to occur?

Do we have to say "yes" to the question "reasonably to occur".. to set this step as a CCP... I don't think so.

am I grown?

Attached Files



Penard

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 171 posts
  • 3 thanks
2
Neutral

  • France
    France
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France
  • Interests:Literature : novels, Sci-Fi, thrillers; Rowing; Personal and Professional travels

Posted 01 February 2008 - 11:59 AM

Hello Al bundy,

Cooking step is considered as a critical control point : if you don't respect the criterias you require to kill all your bacterias or to have a significant decrease, you don't have steps after to control/ reduce your bacterias level. Don't forget sometimes for example you have to maintain right microbiological criterias for 2/3 weeks; if your product isn't cooked enough you could have big issues!

That's the reason why cooking is such an important step, and why it's often considered as a CCP. Last, be careful because some people think cooking destroy all the bacterias, that's wrong : it depends first on your initial contamination first, second on your cooking criterias.

Hope it helps,

Regards,

Emmanuel.



AL BUNDY

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 29 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Chile
    Chile

Posted 02 February 2008 - 02:28 AM

...yes.. I know.. cooking it's a CCP...
but in the hazzard analisis... the m.o. survival it's not a significant hazzard because:
1. it's a step that suposed to kill most bacetrias.
2. You have your process in control with CL and OL

so it's OK to say... hazzard not significant but it's a CCP.. or you have to say.. "yes" the hazzard it's significant just to justify the CCP???

Hi emmanuel... are you a man or woman?... in spanish that name rules for both sex



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,826 posts
  • 1363 thanks
880
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 07 February 2008 - 03:18 PM

Hi emmanuel... are you a man or woman?... in spanish that name rules for both sex

He is definitely a man. :bye:

Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 08 February 2008 - 09:57 AM

Dear Al,

Actually, wud have thought that the entry in yr hazard column wud hv been something like “Failure of cooking process / survival of pathogens, eg as listed below although the cooking process as such is often targeted on a specific species like L.mono I think”.

Not a user of Dtrees myself however I think yr type of question has come up in the forum before and I think other users may agree with you that the text based logic sometimes seems very peculiar. Similar queries have also come up with respect to metal detectors from memory.

I had a look at a few flowcharts and these seem designed to avoid yr textual problem, eg see –

. http://www.wioa.org..../00/paper13.htm

http://www.fao.org/d...g.htm#TopOfPage

Maybe you just have to “go with the flow” :whistle:

Whatever, it’s an interesting post, thanks

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Penard

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 171 posts
  • 3 thanks
2
Neutral

  • France
    France
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France
  • Interests:Literature : novels, Sci-Fi, thrillers; Rowing; Personal and Professional travels

Posted 08 February 2008 - 11:58 AM

Right Simon, definitely... :biggrin:



AL BUNDY

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 29 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Chile
    Chile

Posted 10 February 2008 - 11:44 PM

Hi Charles I agree.... "hazard column wud hv been something like “Failure of cooking process / survival of pathogens, eg as listed below although the cooking process as such is often targeted on a specific species like L.mono I think”.
That it's a USDA generic HACCP model.

About the original question... I found a HACCP in the USDA web used to train the CSI. http://www.fsis.usda...PepperoniHA.pdf

In this HACCP the HA says:
HA need to be adressed YES... CCP NO
HA need to be adressed YES... CCP YES
HA need to be adressed NO... CCP YES
HA need to be adressed NO ... CCP NO

http://www.fsis.usda...PepperoniHA.pdf

So I guess one can use any of this combinations... and you don need to say yes in the HA (as a obligation) in the step where you identified a CCP..

Bye



Charles Chew

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,178 posts
  • 54 thanks
15
Good

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Food, food and food!

Posted 11 February 2008 - 09:51 AM

That it's a USDA generic HACCP model.

You should get a good consulting FS implementor. You appear lost and implementing a Food Safety Program requires basic food safety background. If generic HACCP Model works, there would be no Consultants in this world.

Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 11 February 2008 - 10:59 AM

Dear CharlesChew / Al,

You should get a good consulting FS implementor. You appear lost and implementing a Food Safety Program requires basic food safety background. If generic HACCP Model works, there would be no Consultants in this world.


Hi Charles, business a bit down ? :biggrin:

With respect to the pepperoni link, the column format in Al's link seems a bit weak to me (maybe there was some explanation around it?). I'm not a user of this type of approach but the NO >>YES simply seems self-contradictory, ie wrong.

A few other analogous textual approaches (generic!!) I looked up give a more reasonable presentation, I think -

This one has a, generally comprehensible, detailed explanation of a Dtree format IMO (and a length to match) -
http://www.inspectio...ch2sec47e.shtml

These examples are similar to pepperoni but more clearly analysed IMO ( and give a different result ) -

http://www.fsis.usda...CCP_Student.pdf

http://www.fsis.usda...ls/HACCP-15.pdf.


Rgds / Charles.C

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


AL BUNDY

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 29 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Chile
    Chile

Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:25 PM

Hi Charles C.
I'm not implementing a HACCP. I'm just running my personal knowledge improvement cycle (plan - Implementation - Check - review).. you know.. some time we learn thing but didn't reflex if it's the right way to do it.

Thanx for the help with my :doh: doup questions.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 11 February 2008 - 11:53 PM

It's fine Al.
No questions = No improvement. Both ways. :thumbup:

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Charles Chew

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,178 posts
  • 54 thanks
15
Good

  • Malaysia
    Malaysia
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Interests:Food, food and food!

Posted 12 February 2008 - 01:57 PM

Hi Charles, business a bit down ?

On the contrary Charles C, 2007 was a good year for my FSMS Consultancy. Hoping to move deeper into training and seminars some thing I like to do more of all this while and perhaps some cross border opportunities in 2008.

Cheers
Charles Chew

Cheers,
Charles Chew
www.naturalmajor.com



Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users