Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo
* * * * - 2 votes

Methodology for oPRP and CCP determination


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,869 posts
  • 5253 thanks
1,229
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 19 March 2009 - 03:01 PM

Dear Colleen,

Welcome to the forum :welcome: and thks for yr comments. Yr queries are relevant but their answer is probably "subjective". Bennii ?? :smile:

We hv found previously that putting emails in posts can lead to targetting by spam bots so I've removed yr address.

Rgds / Charles.C


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Colin Joy

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa

Posted 23 March 2009 - 09:35 AM

Re email address: sorry, saw that someone else on the forum had put in a personal address in April last year.

re questions: can someone help me re interpreting those questions in Section 7.4.4 PLEEZE! :unsure:
eg. a) "its effect on identified food safety hazards relative to the strictness applied". the first section is clear, ie. if the control measure illiminates the hazard then it is effective...how does one add the "relative to the strictness applied" part???

It seems as if not all the criteria are on effectiveness, but on the importance of the measure...am I right? eg. e) and f) - how is effectivess assessed here? It seems as if we are assessing its importance by these criteria..???



Simon

    IFSQN...it's My Life

  • IFSQN Admin
  • 12,528 posts
  • 1318 thanks
720
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester
  • Interests:Married to Michelle, Father of three boys (Oliver, Jacob and Louis). I enjoy cycling, walking and travelling, watching sport, especially football and Manchester United. Oh and I love food and beer and wine.

Posted 23 March 2009 - 08:55 PM

BUMP


hand-pointing-down.gif
 
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
 
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 140 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx

 
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html

 

recommend-us-on-facebook.png


S.U.Siddiqui

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 24 posts
  • 5 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Pakistan
    Pakistan
  • Location:Pakistan

Posted 09 April 2009 - 06:02 AM

Hi Collin,

I agree with you on the point. Some terminologies and sentences in the standard are confusing. 7.4.4 (a) asks you to assess the effects of selected control measure(s) on identified hazard relative to YOUR applied strictness.

Consider an example and hope it would help. A magnet attracts iron, we all know that but this attraction depends upon some features i.e. distance from iron, size of iron piece, state of iron piece (free or bound) etc. Hence, despite being a PROVEN iron attractant it will not attract an iron piece from a long distance.

Similarly,a PROVEN control measure (for a particular hazard) may not be effective WITH IN YOUR SYSTEM. It does not mean that the CM is NOT EFFECTIVE, but it shows that due to variable R.M Quality, Process or Other Limitations that CM is not capable of showing the desired EFFECTIVENESS

Standard asks you to assess these kind of limiting factors which can affect the effectiveness of your CM.

Hope this clears the point.

Cheers
Siraj



Thanked by 1 Member:

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 18,869 posts
  • 5253 thanks
1,229
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 10 April 2009 - 05:48 AM

Dear Colin,

I suggest you look up ISO 22004, para 7.4.4. This clarifies some of yr queries although I agree the overall topic is not very transparent. The latter is by design IMO so as to allow subjectivity.

Rgds / Charles.C

@ S.U.Siddiqui. Ths for yr input and welcome to the forum :welcome:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


BVRC

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 40 posts
  • 16 thanks
5
Neutral

  • South Africa
    South Africa

Posted 24 April 2009 - 12:29 PM

Hi folks

Been out of touch with the side for a while. I just started my next ISO 22000 implementation and will tweak the docs a bit from suggestions and see if what we all contributed make things easier/better.

Will keep you posted.
Bennii



s kumar

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 21 December 2010 - 07:51 PM

Dear Benni and shakti,

thks a lot for posting such clarifying docs on assessment of ccps and oprps.

S kumar



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,393 posts
  • 1022 thanks
288
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Koh Samui
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 22 December 2010 - 05:15 AM

Just to add to the comments in this forum:

Strictness can be defined as:
- Kept within narrowly specific limits.
- The fact or condition of being rigorous and unsparing: austerity, hardness, harshness, rigidity, rigor, rigorousness, severity, sternness, stringency, toughness

It seems as if not all the criteria are on effectiveness, but on the importance of the measure...am I right? eg. e) and f) - how is effectivess assessed here? It seems as if we are assessing its importance by these criteria..???


ISO 22004 guidance on the categorization process (As mentioned by Charles):
the impact of a control measure on the hazard level or frequency of occurrence (the higher impact there is, the more likely the control measure belongs to the HACCP plan);
the severity on consumer health of a hazard that the measure is selected to control (the more severe it is, the more likely it belongs to the HACCP plan);
the need for monitoring (the more pressing the need, the more likely it belongs to the HACCP plan).



s kumar

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 3 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:52 PM

Dear Benni,

I found your procedure very informative which gives clear distinction between OPRP and CCP. Just need clarification as asked by Charles on the validation. How can the ratings given or the procedure validated?? Is there any reference available? Hoping to get a reply sooonnn..Tx in advance



shanvtk1

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 13 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Kuwait
    Kuwait

Posted 04 June 2020 - 09:02 AM

informative 



Hitaishee Singh

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 12 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • India
    India

Posted 04 June 2020 - 10:50 AM

informative 

How informative? Post is 9-12 year old. Now as per ISO22K 2018 version, need to update the methodology for OPRP/CCP categorization once again






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users