Just I wanted to know, do any anybody have a decision tree to differentiate between CCP and PRP.
With regards
Pawan
Posted 30 January 2008 - 09:52 PM
Can anybody help Pawan with this query?
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
Posted 28 March 2008 - 05:34 AM
Hi,
In the ISO 22004 standard a decision tree is given to differntiate between PRP, OPRP & CCP.
Biss
Posted 10 July 2008 - 09:12 AM
Decision Tree for HACCP is based on Hazards
Decision Tree for ISO 22000 is based on Control measures.
If you change the word "hazard" with "control measure" in questions of official decision tree of Codex All. Comm. and hazard assesment. you will indicade if control measures are used in HACCP or OPRP.
PRP's other than OPRP's have not CP's/CCP's, cause of the uncontrolling of hazards by its control measures
Best Regards
Vecdi Karacaoğlu
www.nevgrup.com.tr
HACCP Eğitim
Edited by vecdika, 18 July 2008 - 03:05 PM.
Posted 18 July 2008 - 11:34 AM
Thank you vecdi, but document is about labelling. is there a decision tree or any format for oPRP and CCP definition.
Posted 18 July 2008 - 03:12 PM
Dear Arya,
You will find Decision tree for control measures,
After you asses the hazards you will go one step forward to asses the control measures with "the control measure decision tree" given below
Best regards
Vecdi Karacaoğlu
HACCP Eğitim
www.nevgrup.com.tr
Edited by vecdika, 18 July 2008 - 06:16 PM.
Posted 18 July 2008 - 03:49 PM
Dear Firatozel,
In addition to the above helpful information, you might also consider the more "quantitative" tabular procedure for oprps / ccps as per the detailed examples on this forum contributed by Bennii and Modarres (sorry don't remember the 2 threads but search by name should be quick).
added later - just noticed your already existing posts on Bennii / Modarres threads
@ Arya, I very much like the direct logic of yr above explanation however it does seem to somewhat bypass the (I think) ISO 22000 intention to force an extended examination of the various possible control options. Of course, if yr auditor will readily accept it, then one can only
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 19 July 2008 - 11:37 AM
Dear Vecdica,
Thank you for the input. I am sorry I cant understand Turkish very well, but I think its the same diagram just like the one that mentioned in PDF File below. IMO its a development from the traditional DT, but instead of make the oPRP and CCP determination is getting clear, I think it makes me more confuse.
What I mean is the clause no 7.4.4., how come a decision maker differ between oPRP and CCP just based on that point? Is there any spesific way to differ it, pointing on the clause no 7.4.4? But technically... IMVPO... My examination to define the control measure is... somehow more strict perhaps? Because based on my examination, the "No control measures needed" is concluded as oPRP....
To Charles, I havent audited yet... Hope my "direct logic" (I prefer "modification" than "bypass", Charles) would accepted by the auditor. We'll see it on the 23rd of July ... Wish me...
Regards,
Arya
Posted 19 July 2008 - 04:49 PM
Dear Arya,
I do indeed wish you luck. A nice lunch for the auditor is often a worthwhile investment also, IMEX.
Rgds / Charles.C
Kind Regards,
Charles.C
Posted 22 July 2008 - 07:10 PM
Want the easy version?
The trick is to go back to the true meaning of CCP and PRP. The difference is pointed out by the "P"s: a point (CCP) is a scenario, a process step, a stage in time etc. on which you can focus. Typical characteristica are as follows: you can "spot" the occurrence of a hazard, you can control (= avoid / eliminate / reduce) the hazard "on the spot", and the whole action can be - ideally - monitored by the person responsible for the process step. A programm (PRP) has to "run": you can't focus on a spot (step) like a CCP. A typical sign for a prerequisite program is the fact that these programs control "recurrent" hazards which can occur throughout the whole production process (eg foreign bodies, pests, bad / unhygienic manufacturing practice etc.). If you can a) validate the efficiency of a PRP b) use it for a specific purpose (eg. pest control or glass policy) and c) discover that control of this program may have a synergetic effect on other control measures, it may be an oPRP.
Hope that helps...
Posted 11 August 2008 - 10:09 AM
It does for me Dagmar, I'm afraid I missed this at the time. Thank you for your input.Want the easy version?
The trick is to go back to the true meaning of CCP and PRP. The difference is pointed out by the "P"s: a point (CCP) is a scenario, a process step, a stage in time etc. on which you can focus. Typical characteristica are as follows: you can "spot" the occurrence of a hazard, you can control (= avoid / eliminate / reduce) the hazard "on the spot", and the whole action can be - ideally - monitored by the person responsible for the process step. A programm (PRP) has to "run": you can't focus on a spot (step) like a CCP. A typical sign for a prerequisite program is the fact that these programs control "recurrent" hazards which can occur throughout the whole production process (eg foreign bodies, pests, bad / unhygienic manufacturing practice etc.). If you can a) validate the efficiency of a PRP b) use it for a specific purpose (eg. pest control or glass policy) and c) discover that control of this program may have a synergetic effect on other control measures, it may be an oPRP.
Hope that helps...
Get FREE bitesize education with IFSQN webinar recordings.
Download this handy excel for desktop access to over 180 Food Safety Friday's webinar recordings.
https://www.ifsqn.com/fsf/Free%20Food%20Safety%20Videos.xlsx
Check out IFSQN’s extensive library of FREE food safety videos
https://www.ifsqn.com/food_safety_videos.html
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users