Hello everyone,
Greetings!!
Risk assesment forms the basis of any HACCP implementation. However, I understand, that when it comes to SQF, every practice or pre-requisite program that we adopt needs to be on the basis of a systematic risk analysis. For ex.the chemicals to be used, the frequency of cleaning needs to be based on the different hygiene risks pertaining to each area of the facility and surroundings. Similarly, Pest control needs to be based on the risk of infestation in and around the facility and the incoming/outgoing movement of goods.
Now, my query is, that while doing the documentation of PRPs, is it a good idea to do and document a detailed risk analysis related strictly only to that specific PRP, ex pest control, chemical control, FM prevention etc? Or, is it better to go with a risk analysis done and documented for the whole process as a whole and then put relevant control measures wherever applicable.
The first method is more tedious and time consuming, but, in your opinion, Which one seems more robust and effective??
Thanks in advance...
Pavika
- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More