Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

CCP - Bakery product

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

caputofoodsafe

    Grade - Active

  • Newbie
  • 1 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Italy
    Italy

Posted 20 May 2017 - 01:11 PM

Hi everyone,

 

I've read some topics about CCP's bakery product and I could conclude that there are two way of thinking. The most popular is not considered the baking step as a CCP, personally I think that this case is easly applicated when it is talking about a biscuit or a cracker. But if we analyze a different case, like a cake with inside pistachio nut or another type of ingredient that could facilitate the growth of pathogen bacteria like Salmonella, It is rigth consider this step like a CCP? At the end of the baking process the core temperature is between 85°C and 80°C.

 

Waiting your considerations

 

Best regards

 

Giorgio



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 21 May 2017 - 04:16 AM

Hi everyone,

 

I've read some topics about CCP's bakery product and I could conclude that there are two way of thinking. The most popular is not considered the baking step as a CCP, personally I think that this case is easly applicated when it is talking about a biscuit or a cracker. But if we analyze a different case, like a cake with inside pistachio nut or another type of ingredient that could facilitate the growth of pathogen bacteria like Salmonella, It is rigth consider this step like a CCP? At the end of the baking process the core temperature is between 85°C and 80°C.

 

Waiting your considerations

 

Best regards

 

Giorgio

 

Hi Giorgio,

 

Indeed, this topic (CCP or not) has been discussed here, and in the literature, many times.

 

The typical generic , anti-CCP, argument relates to the fact that inadequate baking conditions will automatically render the output visibly unacceptable such that it will never reach the consumer. Hence there is no hazard/risk >>> No  CCP.

Above logic was further discussed in the preliminary drafts for iso22000 concerning CCP, PRP, or oPRP with, IIRC, a null conclusion. Auditors tend to be 50/50 +/- unpredictable.

 

PS - Welcome to the Forum ! :welcome:


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users