Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Site Engineer Competence

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

PropTech

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 16 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 18 April 2021 - 08:37 AM

I have an issue where the business wants to get our recently employed site engineer to carry out services of food processing machinery. The engineer has a lot practical experience with his previous employer and has demonstrated good practice but does not have many formal qualifications (some electrical certification). I have confidence he can carry out the repairs/maintenance however will be deemed competent to an auditor? Any thoughts appreciated.



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,662 posts
  • 1139 thanks
1,132
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 18 April 2021 - 09:58 PM

Most time an auditor may or may not request to see the specialized training documentation to show that the engineer has the expertise to work on certain types of equipment - consider it on-going continuity training.

 

The last audit I attended the Auditor requested to see documentation that showed the maintenance engineers were qualified to effect repairs on a specialized type of sanitary liquid fill carton machine.

 

When the equipment was installed the company that made the equipment sent in two techs to train the staff on routine PM - in this case the manufacturer of the carton machine provided training documentation for each member of the staff and that was accepted by the Auditor.


  • PropTech likes this

All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


Thanked by 1 Member:
PropTech

dfreund

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 87 posts
  • 19 thanks
17
Good

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 April 2021 - 03:22 PM

I don't have an engineer and our equipment is not incredibly complicated.

 

I expect you would be better served to evaluate the end results of the work completed and measure against hygienic design criteria to prove a competent repair has been affected.  A good work order form can flush out the measures to be met at the completion of the job.

 

By this, you can also hire a service contractor and measure their competence of duty the same way.

 

I may be missing something but measure the work not the person.

Dave


  • PropTech likes this

Thanked by 1 Member:
PropTech

Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5665 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 21 April 2021 - 06:18 PM

I have an issue where the business wants to get our recently employed site engineer to carry out services of food processing machinery. The engineer has a lot practical experience with his previous employer and has demonstrated good practice but does not have many formal qualifications (some electrical certification). I have confidence he can carry out the repairs/maintenance however will be deemed competent to an auditor? Any thoughts appreciated.

 

Logically, the expectations may relate to the specific type of food business/machinery involved. For example refrigeration engineering is a specialised topic.


  • PropTech likes this

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:
PropTech


Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users