Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Vacuum Packing & Seal Integrity Monitoring

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

Dee70

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 35 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 20 October 2021 - 06:09 PM

Hi,

 

I've been tasked with creating a vacuum packing / seal integrity procedure & monitoring records - the HACCP document has them both as individual CCP's even though they occur on the same machine. 

 

The products are a range of semi wet doughs, made from cassava /corn & banku mix - the products have a pH of below 4.5 - too acidic to support the growth of the Clostridium botulinum bacteria.

 

The products are treated with Potassium Sorbate to inhibit the growth of moulds, this has the added advantage of making the product more acidic - shouldn't the CCP be at a pH testing step before rather than at Vacuum packing though? If you're relying on pH to keep the product stable then surely this needs to be monitored? 

 

I agree that Seal Integrity needs to be a CCP - I was wondering how you would monitor and verify the process?. Would visual checks at intervals really be enough to control the hazards - I personally don't think they would.

 

Anyway, all of the literature that I have read is relevant to chilled foods, and not ambient, stable products.

 

Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks In Advance.

 

Dee

 

 



seanpaulrader

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 25 posts
  • 11 thanks
15
Good

  • United States
    United States

Posted 20 October 2021 - 06:23 PM

We used a package leak detector similar to this one: https://flexpakinc.com/

 

It was not a CCP for our operation. We had 2 different films that were expected to maintain integrity up to a certain pressure (measured in atmospheres). There was a form that that indicated the product type, product batch number, film type, film batch number, and if the product passed or failed the test, plus corrective actions where appropriate.

 

The test was time consuming. Each test took 2-4 minutes (depending upon the pressure), and our customer required several test replicates. Something to keep in mind when you are setting up your testing methodology. 



Thanked by 1 Member:
Dee70

Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,444 posts
  • 1507 thanks
1,524
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 20 October 2021 - 06:32 PM

Seal integrity is a quality issue. If the seal is blown, no one will buy the product

 

as for the pH, is it altered by the addition of potassium sorbate? or is that an extra fail safe to prevent a change in pH over the shelf life?


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


Thanked by 1 Member:
Dee70

Dee70

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 35 posts
  • 0 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 20 October 2021 - 06:50 PM

Thank you Seanpaulrader -  did you find it to be an effective method of package leak detection? I've never worked anywhere that has used one. 

 

Thank you Scampi - E202 is added to inhibit moulds - it has the added bonus of slightly lowering the acidity. The product is already below the pH4.5 threshold however.



Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,444 posts
  • 1507 thanks
1,524
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 20 October 2021 - 07:43 PM

i would venture that monitoring the addition of the potassium sorbate would be a PC or CCP (up to you) as there are maximums on that product if i'm correct

 

When i worked in dairy, we did destructive seal testing.  A needle attached to an airline, pierce the package, fill with air, cover hole with finger, submerge in water, watch for bubbles. Done and dusted

 

5 packages/30 minutes.   Easy peasy


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


seanpaulrader

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 25 posts
  • 11 thanks
15
Good

  • United States
    United States

Posted 20 October 2021 - 10:04 PM

Thank you Seanpaulrader -  did you find it to be an effective method of package leak detection? I've never worked anywhere that has used one. 

 

It actually worked better as a method of determining when the wrong film had been used. Also, it helped us dial in the temperature settings when we were trialing new films, so that they stuck appropriately. All in all, it worked as intended, though Scampi's suggestion does sound cheaper and easier.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5662 thanks
1,544
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 21 October 2021 - 03:14 AM

Not my area but JFI I note (FSA 2017) that for uncooked items/shelf-life > 10 days, it is required to validate that the food is safe until end of shelf-life allocated.


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this


Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Vacuum Packing, Seal Integrity, Cassava Dough, Corn Dough, Banku Dough, African Cuisine, Procedure, CCP, HACCP, Monitoring

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users